Sarubbi B, Ducceschi V, Esposito R, Briglia N, Manzo G, Mayer M S, Santangelo L, Iacono A
Cattedra di Cardiologia, Seconda Università degli Studi, Napoli.
Cardiologia. 1996 Jun;41(6):543-9.
Transesophageal atrial pacing is a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in patients with supraventricular reciprocating tachycardia (SVRT). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of transesophageal atrial pacing in the selection of the chronic treatment of SVRT. Between June 1993 and March 1995 we have performed transesophageal atrial pacing in 44 patients affected by atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT: n = 28) or atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) using a concealed or manifest bypass tract (n = 16). After a basal (free drug state) transesophageal atrial pacing, we performed serial electropharmacological tests during chronic treatment with sotalol (160 mg/die), flecainide (200 mg/die) and propafenone (450 mg/die). At the end of these tests, the patients were finally discharged with the drug that allowed a more difficult induction or a wider cycle length, and that showed a better clinical tolerance. At the end of the electropharmacological tests 53.6% of the patients affected by AVNRT were discharged with sotalol, 17.8% with propafenone and 28.6% with flecainide. The follow-up of these 28 patients is 11.4 +/- 1.7 months. In the 79.2% of the patients the drug is still effective (absence of whatever episode of SVRT in the follow-up period). In the AVRT group, at the end of the electropharmacological tests, 25% of the patients were discharged with sotalol, 6.25% with propafenone, and 68.75% with flecainide. The follow-up of these 16 patients is 11.7 +/- 1.8 months. In the 78.6% of the patients the drug is still effective (absence of episode of SVRT in the follow-up period).
经食管心房起搏是室上性折返性心动过速(SVRT)患者的一种诊断和治疗工具。本研究的目的是评估经食管心房起搏在选择SVRT慢性治疗方法中的有效性。在1993年6月至1995年3月期间,我们对44例患有房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT:n = 28)或房室折返性心动过速(AVRT)(使用隐匿性或显性旁路传导束,n = 16)的患者进行了经食管心房起搏。在基础状态(无药物状态)下进行经食管心房起搏后,我们在使用索他洛尔(160 mg/天)、氟卡尼(200 mg/天)和普罗帕酮(450 mg/天)进行慢性治疗期间进行了系列电药理学测试。在这些测试结束时,患者最终出院时所使用的药物应是能够更难诱发心动过速或具有更长的心动周期,并且显示出更好的临床耐受性。在电药理学测试结束时,患有AVNRT的患者中有53.6%出院时使用索他洛尔,17.8%使用普罗帕酮,28.6%使用氟卡尼。这28例患者的随访时间为11.4±1.7个月。在79.2%的患者中,该药物仍然有效(随访期间未发生任何SVRT发作)。在AVRT组中,在电药理学测试结束时,25%的患者出院时使用索他洛尔,6.25%使用普罗帕酮,68.75%使用氟卡尼。这16例患者的随访时间为11.7±1.8个月。在78.6%的患者中,该药物仍然有效(随访期间未发生SVRT发作)。