Scorcioni Ruggero, Lazarewicz Maciej T, Ascoli Giorgio A
Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, USA.
J Comp Neurol. 2004 May 24;473(2):177-93. doi: 10.1002/cne.20067.
The dendritic trees of hippocampal pyramidal cells play important roles in the establishment and regulation of network connectivity, synaptic plasticity, and firing dynamics. Several laboratories routinely reconstruct CA3 and CA1 dendrites to correlate their three-dimensional structure with biophysical, electrophysiological, and anatomical observables. To integrate and assess the consistency of the quantitative data available to the scientific community, we exhaustively analyzed 143 completely reconstructed neurons intracellularly filled and digitized in five different laboratories from 10 experimental conditions. Thirty morphometric parameters, including the most common neuroanatomical measurements, were extracted from all neurons. A consistent fraction of parameters (11 of 30) was significantly different between CA3 and CA1 cells. A considerably large number of parameters was also found that discriminated among neurons within the same morphological class, but reconstructed in different laboratories. These interlaboratory differences (8 of 30 parameters) far outweighed the differences between experimental conditions within a single lab, such as aging or preparation method (at most two significant parameters). The set of morphometrics separating anatomical regions and that separating reconstructing laboratories were almost entirely nonoverlapping. CA3 and CA1 neurons could be distinguished by global quantities such as branch order and Sholl distance. Differences among laboratories were largely due to local variables such as branch diameter and local bifurcation angles. Only one parameter (a ratio of branch diameters) separated both morphological classes and reconstructing laboratories. Compartmental simulations of electrophysiological activity showed that both differences between anatomical classes and reconstructing laboratories could dramatically affect the firing rate of these neurons under different experimental conditions.
海马锥体神经元的树突在网络连接、突触可塑性和放电动力学的建立与调节中发挥着重要作用。多个实验室常规性地重建CA3和CA1区的树突,以将其三维结构与生物物理、电生理及解剖学观测结果相关联。为整合和评估科学界可用的定量数据的一致性,我们详尽分析了来自五个不同实验室、在10种实验条件下细胞内填充并数字化的143个完全重建的神经元。从所有神经元中提取了30个形态测量参数,包括最常见的神经解剖学测量指标。CA3和CA1细胞之间有一组参数(30个中的11个)存在显著差异。还发现相当多的参数能够区分同一形态学类别但在不同实验室重建的神经元。这些实验室间的差异(30个参数中的8个)远远超过了单个实验室内部不同实验条件之间的差异,如衰老或制备方法(最多两个显著参数)。区分解剖区域的形态测量指标集与区分重建实验室的指标集几乎完全不重叠。CA3和CA1神经元可以通过诸如分支顺序和肖尔距离等全局量来区分。实验室间的差异很大程度上归因于局部变量,如分支直径和局部分叉角度。只有一个参数(分支直径的比率)能够区分形态学类别和重建实验室。电生理活动的隔室模拟表明,解剖学类别之间以及重建实验室之间的差异在不同实验条件下都可能显著影响这些神经元的放电频率。