Quantin C, Dusserre L, Montaud A M, Mottot C, Feldman J P
Medical Data Processing Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Dijon, France.
Qual Assur Health Care. 1992 Jun;4(2):105-13.
Although many reliability studies on cervical cytology have been carried out, measurements of sensitivity and specificity have rarely been made since biopsies are not often performed on patients with a negative smear result. This screening assessment was performed over 3 years, using a database of 230,167 smears from 177,051 women. It would seem that cervical cytology has a high specificity (over 99%) but a relatively low sensitivity (61%). Values for sensitivity (exceeding 95%) and specificity (exceeding 99%) for invasive carcinoma should be regarded as reasonably accurate as all incident cases of symptomatic cervical carcinoma are recorded in the Burgundy register. The sensitivity (57%) for pre-invasive lesions is underestimated while their prevalence is overestimated: the lack of organized screening leads to the loss of prevalent cases. The predictive value of a positive smear is 76% for moderate-severe dysplasia, 85% for in situ carcinoma and over 95% for invasive carcinoma.