Suppr超能文献

针对1型糖尿病且血糖控制不佳患者的远程护理:一项随机对照试验和荟萃分析。

Telecare for patients with type 1 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Montori Victor M, Helgemoe Pamela K, Guyatt Gordon H, Dean Diana S, Leung Teresa W, Smith Steven A, Kudva Yogish C

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, Nutrition, and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2004 May;27(5):1088-94. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1088.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of telecare (modem transmission of glucometer data and clinician feedback) to support intensive insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients with type 1 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy and with HbA1c >7.8% were randomized to telecare (glucometer transmission with feedback) or control (glucometer transmission without feedback) for 6 months. The primary end point was 6-month HbA1c. To place our findings in context, we pooled HbA1c change from baseline reported in randomized trials of telecare identified in a systematic review of the literature.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, telecare patients had a significantly lower 6-month HbA1c (8.2 vs. 7.8%, P = 0.03, after accounting for HbA1c at baseline) and a nonsignificant fourfold greater chance of achieving 6-month HbA1c < or =7% (29 vs. 7%; risk difference 21.9%, 95% CI -4.7 to 50.5). Nurses spent 50 more min/patient giving feedback on the phone with telecare patients than with control patients. Meta-analysis of seven randomized trials of adult patients with type 1 diabetes found a 0.4% difference (95% CI 0-0.8) in HbA1c mean change from baseline between the telecare and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Telecare is associated with small effects on glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy but with inadequate glycemic control.

摘要

目的

确定远程护理(血糖仪数据的调制解调器传输及临床医生反馈)对支持1型糖尿病且血糖控制不佳患者强化胰岛素治疗的疗效。

研究设计与方法

31例接受强化胰岛素治疗且糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)>7.8%的1型糖尿病患者被随机分为远程护理组(传输血糖仪数据并给予反馈)或对照组(传输血糖仪数据但不给予反馈),为期6个月。主要终点为6个月时的HbA1c。为将我们的研究结果置于背景中,我们汇总了在对文献的系统评价中确定的远程护理随机试验中报告的HbA1c自基线的变化。

结果

与对照组相比,远程护理组患者6个月时的HbA1c显著更低(校正基线HbA1c后,分别为8.2%和7.8%,P = 0.03),且达到6个月时HbA1c≤7%的可能性高出四倍,但差异无统计学意义(分别为29%和7%;风险差值21.9%,95%可信区间为 -4.7%至50.5%)。与对照组患者相比,护士与远程护理组患者通过电话给予反馈时,每位患者多花费50分钟。对七项针对成年1型糖尿病患者的随机试验进行的荟萃分析发现,远程护理组与对照组之间HbA1c自基线的平均变化存在0.4%的差异(95%可信区间为0至0.8)。

结论

对于接受强化胰岛素治疗但血糖控制不佳的1型糖尿病患者,远程护理对血糖控制有轻微影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验