Ali Mohamed M, Cleland John, Shah Iqbal H
Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Mar;82(3):180-6. Epub 2004 Apr 16.
To assess the contraceptive effectiveness of condoms versus oral contraceptive pills and estimate the reproductive consequences of a major shift from pill to condom use.
Secondary analysis was performed on nationally representative cross-sectional surveys of women in 16 developing countries.
In the 16 countries, the median per cent of married couples currently using condoms was 2%, compared with 13% for the pill. Condom users reported a higher 12-month failure and higher method-related discontinuation rates than pill users (9% and 44% vs 6% and 30%, respectively). Condom users were more likely to report subsequent abortion following failure (21% vs 14%), and also more likely to switch rapidly to another method (76% vs 58%). The reproductive consequences, in terms of abortion and unwanted births, of a hypothetical reversal of the relative prevalence of condom and pill were estimated to be minor. The main reason for this unexpected result is that the majority of abortions and unwanted births arise from non-use of any contraceptive method.
A massive shift from the more effective oral contraceptive pills to the less effective condom would not jeopardize policy goals of reducing abortions and unwanted births. However, such a shift would potentially have an added benefit of preventing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections, especially in countries with generalized HIV epidemics.
评估避孕套与口服避孕药的避孕效果,并估计从口服避孕药大量转向使用避孕套可能产生的生殖后果。
对16个发展中国家具有全国代表性的女性横断面调查进行二次分析。
在这16个国家中,目前使用避孕套的已婚夫妇的中位数比例为2%,而使用口服避孕药的比例为13%。与口服避孕药使用者相比,使用避孕套者报告的12个月失败率更高,且与方法相关的停药率也更高(分别为9%和44%,对比6%和30%)。避孕套使用者在避孕失败后更有可能报告随后进行了人工流产(21%对比14%),并且也更有可能迅速改用另一种避孕方法(76%对比58%)。据估计,假设避孕套和口服避孕药的相对流行率发生逆转,在人工流产和意外生育方面产生的生殖后果较小。这一意外结果的主要原因是,大多数人工流产和意外生育是由于未使用任何避孕方法所致。
从更有效的口服避孕药大量转向效果较差的避孕套,不会危及减少人工流产和意外生育的政策目标。然而,这种转变可能会带来预防人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染的额外益处,尤其是在HIV广泛流行的国家。