de Bree Eelco, Koops Wim, Kröger Robert, van Ruth Serge, Witkamp Arjen J, Zoetmulder Frans A N
Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Surg Oncol. 2004 May 1;86(2):64-73. doi: 10.1002/jso.20049.
In patients with colorectal cancer, it is important to diagnose peritoneal carcinomatosis as well as to detect location and size of peritoneal tumor dissemination in view of treatment planning. The aim of this study was to investigate the detection accuracy of computed tomography (CT).
Preoperative CT-scans from 25 consecutive patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal or appendiceal origin were independently blindly reviewed by 2 radiologists. The presence and diameter of tumor deposits were noted in seven abdominopelvic areas. Intraoperative findings were regarded as the gold standard. Agreement was assessed using the Kappa index and the chi-square test.
The presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis was detected in 60 and 76% of those patients by each of the radiologist. Detection of individual peritoneal implants was poor (kappa = 0.11/0.23) and varied from 9.1%/24.3% for tumor size <1 cm to 59.3%/66.7% for tumor size >5 cm. Overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for tumor involvement per area were 24.5%/37.3%, 94.5%/90.4%, 53.0%/60.0%, 86.2%/84.4%, and 47.3%/50.8%, respectively. Accuracy of tumor detection varied widely per anatomic site. Statistically significant interobserver differences were noted, specifically for tumor size of 1-5 cm (P = 0.007) and localization on mesentery and small bowel (kappa = 0.30, P = 0.04).
In colorectal cancer, CT detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis is moderate and of individual peritoneal tumor deposits poor. Interobserver differences are statistically significant. Therefore, preoperative CT seems not to be a reliable tool for detection of presence, size, and location of peritoneal tumor implants in view of treatment planning in patients with colorectal cancer.
对于结直肠癌患者,鉴于治疗规划,诊断腹膜癌病以及检测腹膜肿瘤播散的位置和大小非常重要。本研究的目的是调查计算机断层扫描(CT)的检测准确性。
2名放射科医生对25例连续性结直肠或阑尾来源的腹膜癌病患者的术前CT扫描进行独立盲法评估。记录7个腹盆腔区域肿瘤结节的存在情况和直径。术中发现被视为金标准。使用Kappa指数和卡方检验评估一致性。
每位放射科医生分别在60%和76%的患者中检测到腹膜癌病的存在。对单个腹膜种植灶的检测效果较差(kappa = 0.11/0.23),肿瘤大小<1 cm时的检测率为9.1%/24.3%,肿瘤大小>5 cm时为59.3%/66.7%。每个区域肿瘤累及的总体敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为24.5%/37.3%、94.5%/90.4%、53.0%/60.0%、86.2%/84.4%和47.3%/50.8%。肿瘤检测的准确性在每个解剖部位差异很大。观察者间差异具有统计学意义,特别是对于1 - 5 cm的肿瘤大小(P = 0.007)以及肠系膜和小肠上的定位(kappa = 0.30,P = 0.04)。
在结直肠癌中,CT对腹膜癌病的检测效果中等,对单个腹膜肿瘤结节的检测效果较差。观察者间差异具有统计学意义。因此,鉴于结直肠癌患者的治疗规划,术前CT似乎不是检测腹膜肿瘤种植灶的存在、大小和位置的可靠工具。