Freeman Richard B, Wiesner Russell H, Roberts John P, McDiarmid Suzanne, Dykstra Dawn M, Merion Robert M
Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Am J Transplant. 2004;4 Suppl 9:114-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6135.2004.00403.x.
On February 27, 2002, the liver allocation system changed from a status-based algorithm to one using a continuous MELD/PELD severity score to prioritize patients on the waiting list. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we examine and discuss several aspects of the new allocation, including the development and evolution of MELD and PELD, the relationship between the two scoring systems, and the resulting effect on access to transplantation and waiting list mortality. Additional considerations, such as regional differences in MELD/PELD at transplantation and the predictive effects of rapidly changing MELD/PELD, are also addressed. Death or removal from the waiting list for being too sick for a transplant has decreased in the MELD/PELD era for both children and adults. Children younger than 2 years, however, still have a considerably higher rate of death on the waiting list than adults. A limited definition of ECD livers suggests that they are used more frequently for patients with lower MELD scores.
2002年2月27日,肝脏分配系统从基于状态的算法转变为使用连续的终末期肝病模型(MELD)/小儿终末期肝病模型(PELD)严重程度评分,以便对等待名单上的患者进行优先排序。利用来自移植受者科学登记处的数据,我们研究并讨论了新分配方式的几个方面,包括MELD和PELD的发展与演变、两种评分系统之间的关系,以及对移植可及性和等待名单死亡率的影响。还讨论了其他一些因素,如移植时MELD/PELD的地区差异以及快速变化的MELD/PELD的预测作用。在MELD/PELD时代,儿童和成人因病情过重无法移植而死亡或从等待名单中移除的情况有所减少。然而,2岁以下的儿童在等待名单上的死亡率仍远高于成人。对边缘供肝(ECD)肝脏的有限定义表明,它们更多地用于MELD评分较低的患者。