Suppr超能文献

哮喘幼儿气道功能评估:肺量计、阻断法及感应体积描记法潮气量测定的比较

Assessment of airway function in young children with asthma: comparison of spirometry, interrupter technique, and tidal flow by inductance plethsmography.

作者信息

Black J, Baxter-Jones A D G, Gordon J, Findlay A L, Helms P J

机构信息

Department of Child Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004 Jun;37(6):548-53. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20046.

Abstract

The assessment of airway function in young children requires adaptation of techniques designed for adults and/or application of techniques that do not require complex respiratory maneuvers. We sought to assess two methods of measuring airway function: time to peak expiratory flows as a ratio of expiratory time (T(PTEF)/T(E)), derived from respiratory inductance plethysmography, and total respiratory resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint), both obtained during quiet tidal breathing. Both techniques were referenced to FEV1 and flow at 50% expired volume (FEF50) from conventional spirometry in 30 children aged 4-8 years (median age, 6.9; range, 4.5-8.5 years) with a physician diagnosis of asthma and who were able to perform FEV1 with a repeatability of at least 8%. T(PTEF)/T(E) and Rint were performed in random order followed by spirometry, in order to reduce the possible effects of pulmonary stretch on tidal breathing measures. Coefficients of variation (CV) and mean absolute change/baseline standard deviation were derived for each measurement. Baseline FEV1 did not correlate significantly with T(PTEF)/T(E) (r = 0.025), but did correlate with Rint (r = 0.737, P < 0.001); respective relationships for change after bronchodilator were r = 0.09 (ns) and r = 0.64 (P < 0.001). FEF50 also correlated significantly with Rint (R = 0.769, P < 0.001) but not with T(PTEF)/T(E). FEV1 and FEF50 both increased postbronchodilator, with respective mean changes of 11.4% and 28% (P < 0.001), while Rint decreased by 24.3% (P < 0.001). No significant changes were noted for T(PTEF)/T(E). T(PTEF)/T(E) derived from inductance plethysmography does not detect mild airway obstruction or modest changes in airway caliber following bronchodilator in young children with asthma. The interrupter technique may have a role in assessing baseline airway function and response to therapy in children unable to perform reliable spirometry, and/or when the investigator wishes to avoid the possible influence of forced maneuvers on airway tone.

摘要

评估幼儿的气道功能需要调整适用于成人的技术和/或应用不需要复杂呼吸动作的技术。我们试图评估两种测量气道功能的方法:呼气峰值流量时间与呼气时间之比(T(PTEF)/T(E)),通过呼吸感应体积描记法得出;以及采用阻断器技术测量的总呼吸阻力(Rint),这两种测量均在安静潮气呼吸时进行。将这两种技术与30名年龄在4至8岁(中位年龄6.9岁;范围4.5至8.5岁)、经医生诊断为哮喘且能够进行FEV1测量且重复性至少为8%的儿童的传统肺量计测量的FEV1和呼出体积50%时的流量(FEF50)进行对照。T(PTEF)/T(E)和Rint按随机顺序进行,随后进行肺量计测量,以减少肺扩张对潮气呼吸测量可能产生的影响。得出每次测量的变异系数(CV)和平均绝对变化/基线标准差。基线FEV1与T(PTEF)/T(E)无显著相关性(r = 0.025),但与Rint相关(r = 0.737,P < 0.001);支气管扩张剂治疗后的相应关系为r = 0.09(无统计学意义)和r = 0.64(P < 0.001)。FEF50也与Rint显著相关(R = 0.769,P < 0.001),但与T(PTEF)/T(E)无关。支气管扩张剂治疗后FEV1和FEF50均增加,平均变化分别为11.4%和28%(P < 0.001),而Rint下降了24.3%(P < 0.001)。T(PTEF)/T(E)未观察到显著变化。通过感应体积描记法得出的T(PTEF)/T(E)无法检测出患有哮喘的幼儿的轻度气道阻塞或支气管扩张剂治疗后气道管径的适度变化。阻断器技术可能在评估无法进行可靠肺量计测量的儿童的基线气道功能和对治疗的反应方面发挥作用,和/或当研究者希望避免强制动作对气道张力的可能影响时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验