Fagerlund Birgitte, Mackeprang Torben, Gade Anders, Glenthøj Birte Y
Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
CNS Spectr. 2004 May;9(5):364-74. doi: 10.1017/s1092852900009354.
Studies on the effects of antipsychotics on cognitive deficits in schizophrenia mostly suggest a superior effect of atypical over typical compounds, although findings are inconsistent and effect sizes small. Several methodological issues, such as heterogeneous patient samples, incomparable drug doses, effects of prior medication, construct validity, and retest effects on neuropsychological tasks, confound most results and the comparability between studies. Consequently, the conclusion concerning effects of antipsychotics on cognition is still equivocal.
The present randomized clinical trial examined the effects on cognition of comparatively low doses of a typical antipsychotic (zuclopenthixol) and an atypical antipsychotic (risperidone) in a homogeneous group of drug-naive first-episode schizophrenic patients in a longitudinal setting.
First-episode schizophrenic patients who had never previously been exposed to antipsychotic treatment (N=25) were randomly allocated to treatment with flexible doses of zuclopenthixol or risperidone in an open-label design. Cognitive functions were examined both when patients were drug-naive, and after 13 weeks of treatment. A comprehensive neuropsychological battery was used in order to optimize construct validity, and principal components of cognitive functions were extrapolated in order to reduce type I errors. A healthy control group was tested at baseline and after 13 weeks, in order to examine retest effects. The cognitive domains studied were executive functions, selective attention, and reaction time.
The patients showed considerable cognitive deficits when drug-naive. There were few differential effects of risperidone and zuclopenthixol on cognitive deficits, except for a differential significance, respectively, tendency towards improved reaction and movement times in the risperidone group, and a lack of such in the zuclopenthixol group. These differences were no longer significant after covarying for extrapyramidal side effects and anticholinergic medication that were more prevalent in the zuclopenthixol group and the increases after medication were comparable with retest effects in controls.
The study underscores the importance of examining impact of factors, such as clinical improvement, extrapyramidal side effects, anticholinergic medication and retest effects in longitudinal efficacy studies. This study does not support efficacy of either risperidone or zuclopenthixol on cognitive functions in drug-naive schizophrenia patients after 3 months of medication, because neither could be distinguished from retest effects of the healthy control group.
关于抗精神病药物对精神分裂症认知缺陷影响的研究大多表明,非典型药物比典型药物效果更佳,尽管研究结果并不一致,效应量也较小。一些方法学问题,如患者样本异质性、药物剂量不可比、先前用药的影响、结构效度以及神经心理学任务的重测效应等,使大多数研究结果以及各研究之间的可比性受到混淆。因此,关于抗精神病药物对认知影响的结论仍然不明确。
本随机临床试验在一组未用过药的首发精神分裂症患者中,纵向比较了低剂量典型抗精神病药物(氯普噻吨)和非典型抗精神病药物(利培酮)对认知的影响。
将25例从未接受过抗精神病药物治疗的首发精神分裂症患者,采用开放标签设计随机分配至灵活剂量的氯普噻吨或利培酮治疗组。在患者未用药时以及治疗13周后对认知功能进行检查。使用综合神经心理测验组以优化结构效度,并推断认知功能的主成分以减少I类错误。设立一个健康对照组,在基线期和13周后进行测试,以检查重测效应。所研究的认知领域包括执行功能、选择性注意和反应时间。
患者在未用药时表现出相当大的认知缺陷。利培酮和氯普噻吨对认知缺陷的差异效应较少,除了利培酮组在反应和运动时间改善方面分别有差异显著性和改善趋势,而氯普噻吨组则没有。在对锥体外系副作用和抗胆碱能药物进行协变量调整后,这些差异不再显著,锥体外系副作用和抗胆碱能药物在氯普噻吨组中更为普遍,用药后的增加与对照组的重测效应相当。
该研究强调了在纵向疗效研究中,考察临床改善、锥体外系副作用、抗胆碱能药物和重测效应等因素影响的重要性。本研究不支持利培酮或氯普噻吨在用药3个月后对未用过药的精神分裂症患者认知功能有效,因为两者与健康对照组的重测效应没有区别。