Goldberg Terry E, Goldman Robert S, Burdick Katherine E, Malhotra Anil K, Lencz Todd, Patel Raman C, Woerner Margaret G, Schooler Nina R, Kane John M, Robinson Delbert G
Zucker Hillside Hospital, 7559 263rd Street, Glen Oaks, NY 11004, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;64(10):1115-22. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.10.1115.
Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia is frequent, involves multiple domains, and is enduring. Numerous recent clinical trials have suggested that second-generation antipsychotic medications significantly enhance cognition in schizophrenia. However, none of these studies included healthy controls undergoing repeated testing to assess the possibility that improvements might reflect simple practice effects.
To report the results on cognition of a randomized comparison of 2 widely prescribed second-generation antipsychotic medications, olanzapine and risperidone, in patients with first-episode schizophrenia and a healthy control group.
Randomized clinical trial.
Hospital-based research units. Patients A total of 104 participants with first-episode schizophrenia and 84 healthy controls.
Cognitive assessment of all study participants occurred at baseline, 6 weeks later, and 16 weeks later. Neurocognitive tests included measures of working memory and attention, speed, motor function, episodic memory, and executive function.
No differential drug effects were observed. Of 16 cognitive measures, 9 demonstrated improvement over time and only 2 demonstrated greater rates of change than those observed in the healthy control group undergoing repeated assessment. The composite effect size for cognitive change was 0.33 in the healthy control group (attributed to practice) and 0.36 in the patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Improvements in cognition in the first-episode schizophrenia group could not be accounted for by medication dose, demographic variables, or intellectual level.
The cognitive improvements observed in the trial were consistent in magnitude with practice effects observed in healthy controls, suggesting that some of the improvements in cognition in the first-episode schizophrenia group may have been due to practice effects (ie, exposure, familiarity, and/or procedural learning). Our results also indicated that differential medication effects on cognition were small. We believe that these findings have important implications for drug discovery and the design of registration trials that attempt to demonstrate cognitive enhancement.
精神分裂症患者的认知障碍很常见,涉及多个领域,且持续存在。近期众多临床试验表明,第二代抗精神病药物可显著改善精神分裂症患者的认知。然而,这些研究均未纳入接受重复测试的健康对照,以评估改善是否可能仅反映简单的练习效应。
报告在首发精神分裂症患者和健康对照组中,对两种广泛使用的第二代抗精神病药物奥氮平和利培酮进行随机比较的认知结果。
随机临床试验。
医院研究单位。患者共有104例首发精神分裂症参与者和84例健康对照。
所有研究参与者在基线、6周后和16周后进行认知评估。神经认知测试包括工作记忆、注意力、速度、运动功能、情景记忆和执行功能的测量。
未观察到药物的差异效应。在16项认知测量中,9项随时间有改善,只有2项的变化率高于接受重复评估的健康对照组。健康对照组认知变化的综合效应量为0.33(归因于练习),首发精神分裂症患者为0.36。首发精神分裂症组认知的改善不能用药物剂量、人口统计学变量或智力水平来解释。
试验中观察到的认知改善在程度上与健康对照组的练习效应一致,这表明首发精神分裂症组认知的一些改善可能是由于练习效应(即接触、熟悉和/或程序学习)。我们的结果还表明,药物对认知的差异效应较小。我们认为这些发现对药物研发以及试图证明认知增强的注册试验设计具有重要意义。