Hill S Kristian, Reilly James L, Harris Margret S H, Khine Tin, Sweeney John A
Center for Cognitive Medicine, Department of Psychiatry (M/C 913), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Schizophr Bull. 2008 May;34(3):494-506. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm112. Epub 2007 Oct 10.
Cognitive enhancement has become an important target for drug therapies in schizophrenia. Treatment development in this area requires assessment approaches that are sensitive to procognitive effects of antipsychotic and adjunctive treatments. Ideally, new treatments will have translational characteristics for parallel human and animal research. Previous studies of antipsychotic effects on cognition have relied primarily on paper-and-pencil neuropsychological testing. No study has directly compared neurophysiological biomarkers and neuropsychological testing as strategies for assessing cognitive effects of antipsychotic treatment early in the course of schizophrenia. Antipsychotic-naive patients with schizophrenia were tested before treatment with risperidone and again 6 weeks later. Matched healthy participants were tested over a similar time period. Test-retest reliability, effect sizes of within-subject change, and multivariate/univariate analysis of variance were used to compare 3 neurophysiological tests (visually guided saccade, memory-guided saccade, and antisaccade) with neuropsychological tests covering 4 cognitive domains (executive function, attention, memory, and manual motor function). While both measurement approaches showed robust neurocognitive impairments in patients prior to risperidone treatment, oculomotor biomarkers were more sensitive to treatment-related effects on neurocognitive function than traditional neuropsychological measures. Further, unlike the pattern of modest generalized cognitive improvement suggested by neuropsychological measures, the oculomotor findings revealed a mixed pattern of beneficial and adverse treatment-related effects. These findings warrant further investigation regarding the utility of neurophysiological biomarkers for assessing cognitive outcomes of antipsychotic treatment in clinical trials and in early-phase drug development.
认知增强已成为精神分裂症药物治疗的一个重要目标。该领域的治疗开发需要对抗精神病药物及辅助治疗的促认知作用敏感的评估方法。理想情况下,新的治疗方法应具有适用于平行的人类和动物研究的转化特征。以往关于抗精神病药物对认知影响的研究主要依赖于纸笔神经心理学测试。尚无研究直接比较神经生理生物标志物和神经心理学测试,以此作为在精神分裂症病程早期评估抗精神病药物治疗认知效果的策略。未服用过抗精神病药物的精神分裂症患者在接受利培酮治疗前进行测试,6周后再次测试。匹配的健康参与者在相似时间段内接受测试。采用重测信度、受试者内变化的效应量以及多变量/单变量方差分析,将3种神经生理测试(视觉引导扫视、记忆引导扫视和反扫视)与涵盖4个认知领域(执行功能、注意力、记忆和手动运动功能)的神经心理学测试进行比较。虽然两种测量方法在利培酮治疗前均显示患者存在明显的神经认知损害,但与传统神经心理学测量相比,眼动生物标志物对治疗相关的神经认知功能影响更敏感。此外,与神经心理学测量所显示的适度全面认知改善模式不同,眼动研究结果揭示了治疗相关的有益和不良影响的混合模式。这些发现值得进一步研究神经生理生物标志物在评估临床试验和早期药物开发中抗精神病药物治疗认知结果方面的效用。