Suppr超能文献

美国矫形外科医师学会下肢结局评估工具。可靠性、有效性及对变化的敏感性。

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.

作者信息

Johanson Norman A, Liang Matthew H, Daltroy Lawren, Rudicel Sally, Richmond John

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital and New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 May;86(5):902-9. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200405000-00003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) has developed an array of outcomes assessment instruments designed for the efficient collection of outcomes data from patients of all ages with musculoskeletal conditions in all body regions. The Lower Limb Instruments were developed through a process of literature review, consensus-building, and field-testing.

METHODS

The instruments were distributed to a total of 290 subjects in twenty orthopaedic practices throughout the United States and Canada. Of the 290 patients, seventy each had a diagnosis in the categories of foot and ankle, sports/knee, and hip and knee and forty each had a diagnosis in the categories of trauma and rehabilitation. Retests to be taken twenty-four hours after the first test were distributed to subsamples of patients for each instrument. Seventy-one one-year follow-up questionnaires (twenty-five Sports/Knee, twenty-five Foot and Ankle, sixteen Hip and Knee, and five Lower Limb Core instruments) were returned.

RESULTS

The Lower Limb Core Scale and the Hip and Knee Core Scale, each consisting of seven items addressing pain, stiffness and swelling, and function, performed at an acceptable level. Additional Sports/Knee and Foot and Ankle Modules proved to have internal and retest reliability of 0.80 or better, comparable with the values for well-established measures such as the Short Form-36 (SF-36). All of the new scales were moderately to strongly correlated with other measures of pain and function, such as physician ratings, the SF-36, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Seventy-one patients provided follow-up information for the analysis of sensitivity to change. The Lower Limb Core was found to contribute independently to the prediction of the transition score based on the patient and physician assessments of change.

CONCLUSIONS

The AAOS Lower Limb Instruments for outcomes assessment are highly reliable and are correlated with other measures for similar constructs. They are also sensitive to change in patient status. The Lower Limb Core Scale may be used with attribution of pain either to the lower limb or to a specific joint or side without sacrificing reliability. Combined with the SF-36, the AAOS outcomes assessment instruments comprehensively and efficiently measure outcomes in orthopaedic patients with lower-limb conditions.

摘要

背景

美国矫形外科医师学会(AAOS)已开发出一系列结局评估工具,旨在有效收集所有年龄段、身体各部位患有肌肉骨骼疾病患者的结局数据。下肢评估工具是通过文献综述、共识达成和现场测试的过程开发出来的。

方法

这些工具被分发给美国和加拿大20家骨科诊所的总共290名受试者。在这290名患者中,每组70人分别被诊断为足踝疾病、运动/膝关节疾病以及髋膝关节疾病,每组40人分别被诊断为创伤和康复疾病。每种工具的复测问卷在首次测试24小时后分发给患者子样本。共收回71份一年期随访问卷(25份运动/膝关节问卷、25份足踝问卷、16份髋膝关节问卷和5份下肢核心问卷)。

结果

下肢核心量表和髋膝关节核心量表各包含7个项目,涉及疼痛、僵硬、肿胀和功能,表现出可接受的水平。额外的运动/膝关节模块和足踝模块的内部一致性和复测信度达到0.80或更高,与诸如简明健康状况调查量表(SF - 36)等成熟量表的值相当。所有新量表与疼痛和功能的其他测量方法,如医生评分、SF - 36以及西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC),均呈中度至高度相关。71名患者提供了随访信息用于分析变化敏感性。基于患者和医生对变化的评估,发现下肢核心量表对转变分数的预测有独立贡献。

结论

AAOS用于结局评估的下肢工具具有高度可靠性,且与类似结构的其他测量方法相关。它们对患者状态的变化也很敏感。下肢核心量表可用于将疼痛归因于下肢或特定关节或部位,而不影响可靠性。与SF - 36相结合,AAOS结局评估工具能全面、有效地测量患有下肢疾病的骨科患者的结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验