Farhoomand Kaveh, Connor Jason T, Richter Joel E, Achkar Edgar, Vaezi Michael F
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Swallowing and Esophageal Disorders, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio, USA.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 May;2(5):389-94. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00123-5.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Graded pneumatic dilation (PD) is a widely accepted treatment for achalasia. We investigated the potential predictors of outcome in a large group of patients with achalasia and tested the hypothesis that graded PD may not be appropriate for all patients.
Patients undergoing PD from 1992 to 2002 were evaluated retrospectively. Symptom scores (0-15) for dysphagia (0-5), regurgitation (0-5), and chest pain (0-5), as well as degree of esophageal emptying by timed barium swallow, were assessed for all patients. Failure was defined as the return of symptoms resulting in repeated PD or surgical myotomy. Clinical data assessed for short- and long-term predictors of response.
Seventy-five patients with achalasia without previous therapy constituted the studied population. Three-year success rates for PD using 3.0-cm, 3.0-cm followed by 3.5-cm, and 3.0-cm and 3.5-cm followed by 4.0-cm Rigiflex balloons were 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26-53), 76% (95% CI, 65-88), and 88% (95% CI, 80-97), respectively. Patient age and sex were important treatment outcome predictors. A Cox proportional hazards model of time to additional therapy on sex and 10-year increase in age showed that 3.0-cm PD was significantly (P = 0.04) more likely to fail in younger men than older men (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.98). In 25 of 68 patients (37%) initially treated with a 3.0-cm balloon, PD failed within 3 months. Twenty-two of 25 patients (88%) with early failure were men.
(1) Young men have a greater failure rate with 3.0-cm PD than older men or women in general, and (2) graded PD in this group starting initially with the 3.0-cm balloon is more likely to fail.
分级气囊扩张术(PD)是一种广泛应用于贲门失弛缓症的治疗方法。我们在一大群贲门失弛缓症患者中研究了治疗结果的潜在预测因素,并检验了分级PD可能并不适用于所有患者这一假设。
对1992年至2002年期间接受PD治疗的患者进行回顾性评估。对所有患者评估吞咽困难(0 - 5分)、反流(0 - 5分)和胸痛(0 - 5分)的症状评分(0 - 15分),以及通过定时吞钡检查评估食管排空程度。治疗失败定义为症状复发导致再次进行PD或手术肌切开术。评估临床数据以寻找反应的短期和长期预测因素。
75例未经先前治疗的贲门失弛缓症患者构成研究人群。使用3.0厘米、3.0厘米后接3.5厘米、3.0厘米和3.5厘米后接4.0厘米的Rigiflex球囊进行PD的三年成功率分别为37%(95%置信区间[CI],26 - 53)、76%(95% CI,65 - 88)和88%(95% CI,80 - 97)。患者年龄和性别是重要的治疗结果预测因素。一项关于性别和年龄每增加10岁至额外治疗时间的Cox比例风险模型显示,3.0厘米的PD在年轻男性中比老年男性显著更易失败(P = 0.04)(风险比,0.63;95% CI,0.41 - 0.98)。在最初用3.0厘米球囊治疗的68例患者中的25例(37%)中,PD在3个月内失败。早期失败的25例患者中的22例(88%)为男性。
(1)总体而言,年轻男性接受3.0厘米PD治疗的失败率高于老年男性或女性,(2)该组中最初采用3.0厘米球囊的分级PD更易失败。