Torresan Francesco, Cortellini Fabio, Azzaroli Francesco, Ioannou Alexandros, Mularoni Cecilia, Shoshan Dikla, Mandolesi Daniele, De Giorgio Roberto, Karamanolis George, Bazzoli Franco
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Francesco Torresan, Fabio Cortellini, Francesco Azzaroli, Daniele Mandolesi, Franco Bazzoli).
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Fabio Cortellini, Francesco Azzaroli, Cecilia Mularoni, Dikla Shoshan, Franco Bazzoli).
Ann Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan-Feb;35(1):28-33. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0683. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
The efficacy of pneumatic dilation (PD) in the management of achalasia has yielded variable results. The availability of high-resolution manometry led to the identification of 3 clinically relevant subtypes of achalasia, revealing the poor efficacy of PD in subtype III. Furthermore, PD showed a lower response rate in patients with subtype III compared to laparoscopic Heller myotomy and peroral endoscopic myotomy. This study aimed to investigate the short- and long-term efficacy, safety profile and side effects of PD with a "graded approach" in subtypes I and II achalasia.
We enrolled 141 patients (male 67, mean age=66±16.26 years) with achalasia (n=27 subtype I, n=74 subtype II and n=40 subtype III) between January 2010 and July 2020 at St. Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy. We analyzed the data of patients with subtypes I and II, who underwent a graded-protocol PD. Short- and long-term clinical efficacy, complications and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were recorded.
One month after graded protocol PD, 100% subtype I and 96.2% subtype II achalasia patients showed clinical remission. The PD procedure was completed without major complications in all patients. In the long-term follow up (median time: 56 months), 95.5% subtype I and 90% subtype II achalasia patients had an Eckardt score ≤3. GERD occurred in 27.7% of all patients.
A graded-protocol PD applied in the appropriate achalasia subtypes was shown to be a safe and highly effective approach, in both the short- and long-term.
气囊扩张术(PD)治疗贲门失弛缓症的疗效不一。高分辨率测压法的应用使贲门失弛缓症可分为3种临床相关亚型,显示出PD对Ⅲ型患者疗效不佳。此外,与腹腔镜Heller肌切开术和经口内镜肌切开术相比,PD在Ⅲ型患者中的缓解率较低。本研究旨在探讨采用“分级方法”的PD治疗Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型贲门失弛缓症的短期和长期疗效、安全性及副作用。
2010年1月至2020年7月,我们在意大利博洛尼亚圣奥索拉大学医院招募了141例贲门失弛缓症患者(男性67例,平均年龄=66±16.26岁)(Ⅰ型27例,Ⅱ型74例,Ⅲ型40例)。我们分析了接受分级方案PD治疗的Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型患者的数据。记录短期和长期临床疗效、并发症及胃食管反流病(GERD)情况。
分级方案PD术后1个月,100%的Ⅰ型和96.2%的Ⅱ型贲门失弛缓症患者临床缓解。所有患者的PD手术均无严重并发症完成。在长期随访中(中位时间:56个月),95.5%的Ⅰ型和90%的Ⅱ型贲门失弛缓症患者Eckardt评分≤3。27.7%的患者发生GERD。
在适当的贲门失弛缓症亚型中应用分级方案PD,无论短期还是长期,均显示是一种安全且高效的方法。