• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年贲门失弛缓症患者的气囊扩张治疗。

Pneumatic Dilation in Geriatric Achalasia Patients.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr;34(4):332-338. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2023.22178.

DOI:10.5152/tjg.2023.22178
PMID:36789986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10210637/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to share the effectiveness of pneumatic dilation in geriatric achalasia patients.

METHODS

Achalasia patients over the age of 65 and those under the age of 65 as the control group who received pneumatic dilation as the first-line treatment were evaluated in the study.

RESULTS

The average age of geriatric patients was 72.5 ± 55.92 years (65-90), with 50.3% of them being male. Follow-up was conducted for a mean of 64.52 ± 38.73 months. While pneumatic dilation was successful in 98.6% (141/143) of geriatric patients, it was also successful in 94% (141/150) of non-geriatric patients. Remission after single balloon dilatation was observed in 81.8% of geriatric patients, while it was observed in only 52.7% of non-geriatric patients (P = .000). When comparing remission after single dilatation and multiple dilatations, it was observed that geriatric patients who achieved remission after multiple balloon dilatation had higher lower esophageal sphincter pressure and Eckardt scores at the diagnosis and higher lower esophageal sphincter pressure and esophageal body resting pressures after the first balloon dilatation.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of elders in the world population is increasing daily and this disease has been known to disproportionately afflict this group. Although surgical treatments, in particular per-oral endoscopic myotomy, have recently gained popularity as therapies for achalasia, pneumatic dilation remains the most commonly used in geriatric patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在分享气囊扩张术治疗老年贲门失弛缓症患者的疗效。

方法

本研究评估了 65 岁以上(老年组)和 65 岁以下(对照组)接受气囊扩张术作为一线治疗的贲门失弛缓症患者。

结果

老年患者的平均年龄为 72.5 ± 55.92 岁(65-90 岁),其中 50.3%为男性。平均随访 64.52 ± 38.73 个月。虽然气囊扩张术在 98.6%(141/143)的老年患者中获得成功,在 94%(141/150)的非老年患者中也获得成功。单次球囊扩张后缓解率在老年患者中为 81.8%,而非老年患者中仅为 52.7%(P =.000)。比较单次和多次扩张后的缓解率,发现多次气囊扩张后缓解的老年患者在诊断时食管下括约肌压力和 Eckardt 评分较高,首次球囊扩张后食管下括约肌压力和食管体静息压力较高。

结论

全球人口中老年人的比例日益增加,这种疾病在这一人群中发病率更高。虽然手术治疗,特别是经口内镜肌切开术,最近已成为贲门失弛缓症的治疗方法,但气囊扩张术仍然是老年患者最常用的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Pneumatic Dilation in Geriatric Achalasia Patients.老年贲门失弛缓症患者的气囊扩张治疗。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr;34(4):332-338. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2023.22178.
2
Achalasia-Specific Quality of Life After Pneumatic Dilation or Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy With Partial Fundoplication: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial.气囊扩张术或腹腔镜下贲门肌切开术加部分胃底折叠术后贲门失弛缓症患者的特定生活质量:一项多中心随机临床试验
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;111(11):1536-1545. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.402. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
3
Effect of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy vs Pneumatic Dilation on Symptom Severity and Treatment Outcomes Among Treatment-Naive Patients With Achalasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经口内镜肌切开术与气囊扩张治疗原发性贲门失弛缓症患者的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jul 9;322(2):134-144. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8859.
4
Efficacy of pneumodilation in achalasia after failed Heller myotomy.贲门失弛缓症患者行Heller肌切开术失败后气囊扩张术的疗效
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Nov;28(11):1741-1746. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12875. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
5
Mucosal perforation during laparoscopic surgery for achalasia: impact of preoperative pneumatic balloon dilation.贲门失弛缓症腹腔镜手术中的黏膜穿孔:术前气囊扩张的影响
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1427-1435. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5133-1. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
6
Effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia patients with failure of prior pneumatic dilation: a prospective case-control study.经口内镜下肌切开术对既往气囊扩张失败的贲门失弛缓症患者的疗效:一项前瞻性病例对照研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Aug;29(8):1609-13. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12570.
7
Peroral endoscopic myotomy versus pneumatic dilation in treatment-naive patients with achalasia: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.经口内镜下肌切开术与气囊扩张治疗原发性贲门失弛缓症的随机对照研究:5 年随访结果
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Dec;7(12):1103-1111. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00300-4. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
8
Treatments for pediatric achalasia: Heller myotomy or pneumatic dilatation?小儿贲门失弛缓症的治疗方法:赫勒肌切开术还是气囊扩张术?
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2010 Mar;34(3):202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gcb.2009.10.022. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
9
Pneumatic balloon dilatation in primary achalasia: the long-term follow-up results.原发性贲门失弛缓症的气囊扩张术:长期随访结果
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Mar-Apr;52(62):475-80.
10
Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller's myotomy for idiopathic achalasia.气囊扩张与腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术治疗特发性贲门失弛缓症。
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1807-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1010502.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Achalasia Following Pneumatic Dilation Treatment: A Single Center Experience.贲门失弛缓症患者经气囊扩张治疗后的临床结局:单中心经验
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 2;14(15):5448. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155448.
2
Effectiveness and safety of full-thickness versus circular muscle myotomy in peroral endoscopic myotomy: a retrospective single-center analysis of 152 patients.经口内镜下肌切开术中全层肌切开与环形肌切开的有效性和安全性:一项对152例患者的单中心回顾性分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1720-1729. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11463-w. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
3
Safety of Pneumatic Dilation in Older Adults with Achalasia: An International Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.老年贲门失弛缓症患者气囊扩张术的安全性:一项国际多中心横断面研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 23;12(20):6682. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206682.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Geriatric Patients with Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经口内镜下肌切开术在老年贲门失弛缓症患者中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis. 2022;40(1):106-114. doi: 10.1159/000516024. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
2
Epidemiologic and Economic Burden of Achalasia in the United States.美国贲门失弛缓症的流行病学和经济负担。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;20(2):342-352.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.02.035. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
3
Efficacy of surgical or endoscopic treatment of idiopathic achalasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.特发性贲门失弛缓症的手术或内镜治疗效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan;6(1):30-38. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30296-X. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
4
European guidelines on achalasia: United European Gastroenterology and European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility recommendations.欧洲贲门失弛缓症指南:欧洲胃肠病学联合会和欧洲神经胃肠病学和动力学会的建议。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Feb;8(1):13-33. doi: 10.1177/2050640620903213.
5
Esophageal Dysphagia in the Elderly.老年人的食管吞咽困难
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;17(4):534-553. doi: 10.1007/s11938-019-00264-z.
6
The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines.2018年国际吞咽障碍食管动力学会贲门失弛缓症指南。
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Sep 1;31(9). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy071.
7
Perforation following pneumatic dilation of achalasia cardia in a university hospital in northern India: A two-decade experience.印度北部一家大学医院贲门失弛缓症气囊扩张术后穿孔:二十年经验
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul;37(4):347-352. doi: 10.1007/s12664-018-0874-5. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
8
Results of pneumatic dilation in treating achalasia: predictive factors.气囊扩张治疗贲门失弛缓症的结果:预测因素。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Dec;1434(1):124-131. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13844. Epub 2018 May 16.
9
Outcomes of pneumatic dilation in achalasia: Extended follow-up of more than 25 years with a focus on manometric subtypes.贲门失弛缓症气囊扩张治疗的结果:25 年以上的扩展随访,重点关注测压亚型。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 May;33(5):1067-1074. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14044. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
10
Laparoscopic Heller myotomy is not superior to pneumatic dilation in the management of primary achalasia: Conclusions of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.在原发性贲门失弛缓症的治疗中,腹腔镜下赫勒肌切开术并不优于气囊扩张术:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析结论
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(7):e5525. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005525.