Jackson Shelly L
Institute of Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0660, USA.
Child Abuse Negl. 2004 Apr;28(4):411-21. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.09.020.
Child Advocacy Centers (CACs) are designed to improve the community collaborative response to child sexual abuse and the criminal justice processing of child sexual abuse cases. CACs, in existence for 16 years, now have standards for membership developed by the National Children's Alliance (NCA) that include nine core components. And yet no systematic examination of the CAC model exists. The purpose of this paper was to assess the variations within these core components as they exist in the field.
Using a stratified random sampling design, 117 CAC directors were interviewed using a semi-structured interview that was based on the NCA's standards for membership. The eight core components of the CAC model examined in this study include: a child-friendly facility, a multidisciplinary team, an investigative child interview, a medical examination of the child, provision of mental health services, victim advocacy, case review, and case tracking.
Results reveal the CAC model has been widely adopted by both member and nonmember centers, although variations in implementation exist.
Future developments in the CAC model must include evaluation of the model.
儿童权益保护中心(CACs)旨在改善社区对儿童性虐待的协同应对以及儿童性虐待案件的刑事司法处理。已经存在了16年的儿童权益保护中心现在有了由全国儿童联盟(NCA)制定的会员标准,其中包括九个核心组成部分。然而,目前尚无对儿童权益保护中心模式的系统研究。本文的目的是评估这些核心组成部分在实际应用中的差异。
采用分层随机抽样设计,对117名儿童权益保护中心主任进行了访谈,访谈采用基于全国儿童联盟会员标准的半结构化访谈。本研究中考察的儿童权益保护中心模式的八个核心组成部分包括:儿童友好型设施、多学科团队、对儿童的调查性访谈、对儿童的医学检查、提供心理健康服务、受害者支持、案件审查和案件跟踪。
结果显示,儿童权益保护中心模式已被会员中心和非会员中心广泛采用,尽管在实施过程中存在差异。
儿童权益保护中心模式未来的发展必须包括对该模式的评估。