Suppr超能文献

实施儿童倡导中心儿童创伤后应激的护理过程模型:混合方法研究。

Implementation of A Care Process Model for Pediatric Traumatic Stress in Child Advocacy Centers: A Mixed Methods Study.

机构信息

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Child Sex Abus. 2022 Oct;31(7):761-781. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2022.2133759. Epub 2022 Oct 15.

Abstract

Child Advocacy Centers (CACs) are well-positioned to identify children with mental health needs and facilitate access to evidence-based treatment. However, use of evidence-based screening tools and referral protocols varies across CACs. Understanding barriers and facilitators can inform efforts to implement mental health screening and referral protocols in CACs. We describe statewide efforts implementing a standardized screening and referral protocol, the Care Process Model for Pediatric Traumatic Stress (CPM-PTS), in CACs. Twenty-three CACs were invited to implement the CPM-PTS. We used mixed methods to evaluate the first two years of implementation. We quantitatively assessed adoption, reach, and acceptability; qualitatively assessed facilitators and barriers; and integrated quantitative and qualitative data to understand implementation of mental health screening in CACs. Eighteen CACs adopted the CPM-PTS. Across CACs, screening rates ranged from 10% to 100%. Caregiver ratings indicated high acceptability. Facilitators and barriers were identified within domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Qualitative findings provided insight into adoption, reach, and caregivers' responses. Our findings suggest screening for traumatic stress and suicidality in CACs is valued, acceptable, and feasible. Implementation of mental health screening and referral protocols in CACs may improve identification of children with mental health needs and support treatment engagement.

摘要

儿童倡导中心(CACs)非常适合识别有心理健康需求的儿童,并为他们提供循证治疗。然而,CACs 之间使用循证筛查工具和转介协议的情况各不相同。了解障碍和促进因素可以为在 CACs 中实施心理健康筛查和转介协议提供信息。我们描述了全州范围内实施标准化筛查和转介协议,即儿科创伤后应激障碍的关怀过程模型(CPM-PTS)的努力。23 个 CAC 被邀请实施 CPM-PTS。我们使用混合方法评估了实施的头两年。我们定量评估了采用率、覆盖率和可接受性;定性评估了促进因素和障碍;并整合了定量和定性数据,以了解 CAC 中心理健康筛查的实施情况。18 个 CAC 采用了 CPM-PTS。在 CACs 中,筛查率从 10%到 100%不等。照顾者的评分表明可接受性很高。在实施研究的综合框架内确定了促进因素和障碍。定性研究结果深入了解了采用、覆盖范围和照顾者的反应。我们的研究结果表明,在 CACs 中筛查创伤后应激障碍和自杀风险是有价值的、可接受的和可行的。在 CACs 中实施心理健康筛查和转介协议可能会提高对有心理健康需求的儿童的识别,并支持治疗参与。

相似文献

3
Domestic violence assessments in the child advocacy center.儿童保护中心的家庭暴力评估。
Child Abuse Negl. 2010 Mar;34(3):172-82. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.10.002. Epub 2010 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

6
Trauma-focused Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Traumatized Children and Families.针对受创伤儿童及其家庭的创伤聚焦认知行为疗法。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2015 Jul;24(3):557-70. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
7
8
Universal mental health screening in pediatric primary care: a systematic review.儿科初级保健中的普遍心理健康筛查:系统评价。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;52(11):1134-1147.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验