Mishara Aaron L, Goldberg Terry E
Clinical Brain Disorders Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Biol Psychiatry. 2004 May 15;55(10):1013-22. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.01.027.
In recent years, numerous studies have examined whether new-generation antipsychotic agents impact cognitive impairment in patients with schizophrenia when compared with conventional antipsychotic treatment. The working assumption of such studies, supported by narrative reviews, is that the conventional antipsychotic medications have little or no effect on cognition. The studies concerning the effects of conventional neuroleptics on cognition, however, have never been analyzed quantitatively. In this meta-analysis, we revisit the question of whether typical agents might have enhancing effects on cognition.
The meta-analysis included studies that 1) compared the effects of typical neuroleptic agents with those of placebo or no medication on cognition; 2) examined adult patients identified as having schizophrenia; and 3) produced adequate data to estimate an effect size. Studies were identified by searches of computerized literature databases and by cross-referencing included studies. The effect size calculated was d, the difference between the means in cognitive measures of patients with schizophrenia taking and not taking conventional neuroleptic medication, divided by the pooled SD. Critically, when multiple measures were reported in a single article, effect sizes were combined so as to minimize the possibility that one study had undue weight simply because of the number of cognitive outcome variables that it contained. These results were corrected for bias due to sample size, with each of the effect sizes weighted by the reciprocal of its variance. The final sample after exclusion of outliers comprised 208 effect sizes from 34 studies.
With a random-effects model, effect sizes from the primary studies were weighted according to sample size and averaged. The resulting mean effect size was.22 (95% confidence interval =.10,.34). The result is positive, in that the range did not include zero and was of low moderate size. No moderating effects of study design or patient qualities were found to be significant. With the same procedures, effect sizes for individual neurocognitive domains were computed. Effect sizes were generally in the.13-.29 range for the majority of cognitive functions, whereas motor function was impacted negatively (-.11). Unexpectedly, medication dose did not correlate with effect size.
Typical antipsychotic medication provides modest-to-moderate gains in multiple cognitive domains. Given unavoidable methodologic limitations of the primary studies, current findings suggest that the impact of conventional medication on cognitive function should be re-evaluated.
近年来,许多研究探讨了与传统抗精神病药物治疗相比,新一代抗精神病药物是否会影响精神分裂症患者的认知障碍。这些研究的基本假设在叙述性综述的支持下,认为传统抗精神病药物对认知几乎没有影响。然而,有关传统抗精神病药物对认知影响的研究从未进行过定量分析。在这项荟萃分析中,我们重新审视典型药物是否可能对认知有增强作用的问题。
荟萃分析纳入的研究需满足以下条件:1)比较典型抗精神病药物与安慰剂或无药物治疗对认知的影响;2)研究成年精神分裂症患者;3)产生足够数据以估计效应大小。通过检索计算机化文献数据库并交叉引用纳入的研究来识别研究。计算的效应大小为d,即服用和未服用传统抗精神病药物的精神分裂症患者认知测量均值之差除以合并标准差。关键的是,当一篇文章报告多个测量指标时,效应大小进行合并,以尽量减少因一项研究包含的认知结果变量数量而使其权重过大的可能性。这些结果针对样本量偏差进行了校正,每个效应大小按其方差的倒数加权。排除异常值后的最终样本包括来自34项研究的208个效应大小。
采用随机效应模型,根据样本量对主要研究的效应大小进行加权并求平均值。得到的平均效应大小为0.22(95%置信区间 = 0.10,0.34)。结果为阳性,因为范围不包括零且为低到中等大小。未发现研究设计或患者特征的调节效应具有显著性。采用相同程序计算各个神经认知领域的效应大小。大多数认知功能的效应大小一般在0.13 - 0.29范围内,而运动功能受到负面影响(-0.11)。出乎意料的是,药物剂量与效应大小无关。
典型抗精神病药物在多个认知领域有适度到中等程度的改善。鉴于主要研究不可避免的方法学局限性,当前研究结果表明应重新评估传统药物对认知功能的影响。