Suppr超能文献

锂对认知表现的影响:一项荟萃分析。

Effects of lithium on cognitive performance: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;70(11):1588-97. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08r04972. Epub 2009 Aug 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment is underrecognized among patients with bipolar disorder and may represent not only effects of the illness but also adverse effects of its treatments. Among these, lithium is the best-studied mood stabilizer. As its cognitive effects are mixed and not well-known, we assessed reported effects of lithium on cognitive performance.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and EMBASE databases (1950 to December 2008) were queried with the keywords lithium, cognit*, neurocognit*, neuropsych*, psycholog*, attention, concentration, processing speed, memory, executive, and learning. Database searches were supplemented with bibliographic cross-referencing by hand. The literature search was conducted independently by 2 authors (A.P.W. and T.S.W.) during August and September 2008, and questions about appropriate inclusion or exclusion were resolved between them by consensus.

STUDY SELECTION

Of 586 reports initially identified as being of potential interest, 12, involving 539 subjects, met our inclusion criteria: (1) cognitive performance compared between subjects taking lithium and comparable subjects not taking lithium; comparability was assured by: (2) patients with the same affective disorder diagnoses in euthymic or remitted status or healthy volunteers; (3) groups of similar age and sex; (4) similar intelligence, education, or occupation; (5) similar distribution of other concurrent psychotropic drugs; and (6) cognitive abilities (outcomes) assessed with performance-based measures.

DATA EXTRACTION

Standardized mean-difference effect size (ES), corrected for small-sample bias (Hedges' g), was computed for cognitive tasks in each study. ES estimates were transformed so that positive values indicate poorer performance by lithium-treated subjects. Infrequently, when means and standard deviations were not provided, ES was estimated from reported values of t, F, or z tests. For analysis, similar neurocognitive tests were grouped a priori based on the cognitive domains they aimed to assess.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We identified 12 studies involving 276 lithium-treated and 263 similar or the same subjects, lithium-free. Lithium was taken for a mean duration of 3.9 years by affective disorder patients and 2.5 weeks by healthy volunteers, yielding a mean daily trough serum concentration of 0.80 mEq/L. Overall, lithium treatment was associated with small but significant impairment in immediate verbal learning and memory (ES = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.05-0.43) and creativity (ES = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.02-0.64), whereas delayed verbal memory, visual memory, attention, executive function, processing speed, and psychomotor performance were not significantly affected. Selectively, among the 326 affective-disorder patients, in addition to these overall impairments, long-term lithium treatment also was associated with even greater impairment in psychomotor performance (ES = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.27-0.97), with no evidence of cognitive improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

Lithium treatment appears to have only few and minor negative effects on cognition.

摘要

背景

双相障碍患者的认知障碍未得到充分认识,其不仅可能是疾病的影响,也可能是治疗的不良反应。其中,锂是研究最多的心境稳定剂。由于其认知作用混杂且不为人知,我们评估了锂对认知表现的报告影响。

数据来源

1950 年至 2008 年 12 月,通过关键词“锂”、“cognit*”、“neurocognit*”、“neuropsych*”、“psycholog*”、“attention”、“concentration”、“processing speed”、“memory”、“executive”和“learning”,在 MEDLINE、PsycINFO 和 EMBASE 数据库中进行了检索。通过手工交叉参考书目进行了数据库搜索的补充。两位作者(A.P.W. 和 T.S.W.)于 2008 年 8 月和 9 月独立进行了文献检索,通过协商解决了有关适当纳入或排除的问题。

研究选择

最初确定的 586 份报告中,有 12 份报告(涉及 539 名受试者)符合我们的纳入标准:(1)比较服用锂和未服用锂的受试者之间的认知表现;可比性通过以下方式得到保证:(2)处于缓解或缓解状态的相同情感障碍诊断的患者或健康志愿者;(3)年龄和性别相似的组;(4)相似的智力、教育或职业;(5)类似的其他同时使用的精神药物分布;以及(6)使用基于表现的测量来评估认知能力(结果)。

数据提取

计算了每项研究中认知任务的标准化均数差异效应大小(ES),并对小样本偏差进行了校正(Hedges'g)。ES 估计值转换为正值,表示锂治疗组的表现较差。很少情况下,如果未提供均值和标准差,则从报告的 t、F 或 z 检验值估计 ES。为了分析,根据它们旨在评估的认知域,将类似的神经认知测试预先分组。

数据综合

我们确定了 12 项研究,涉及 276 名锂治疗和 263 名相似或相同的受试者,无锂治疗。锂治疗的情感障碍患者平均持续 3.9 年,健康志愿者平均持续 2.5 周,得出平均每日谷血清浓度为 0.80mEq/L。总的来说,锂治疗与即时言语学习和记忆(ES=0.24;95%CI,0.05-0.43)和创造力(ES=0.33;95%CI,0.02-0.64)的轻微但显著的损害有关,而延迟言语记忆、视觉记忆、注意力、执行功能、处理速度和运动表现不受显著影响。在 326 名情感障碍患者中,除了这些总体损害外,长期锂治疗还与运动表现的甚至更大损害相关(ES=0.62;95%CI,0.27-0.97),且没有认知改善的证据。

结论

锂治疗似乎对认知只有很少且轻微的负面影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验