Manley Harold J, Garvin Cory G, Drayer Debra K, Reid Gerald M, Bender Walter L, Neufeld Timothy K, Hebbar Sudarshan, Muther Richard S
University of Missouri, Kansas City, Kansas City School of Pharmacy, Kansas City, MI 64108, USA.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Jul;19(7):1842-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh280. Epub 2004 May 5.
End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are prescribed numerous medications. The United States Renal Data System (USRDS) reported on medication prescribing patterns in 1998. Since then, several new medications, treatment guidelines and recommendations have been introduced. The objective was to analyse and compare haemodialysis (HD) patient medication prescribing patterns between the Dialysis Clinic, Inc. (DCI) database and the USRDS report.
Point-prevalent (01/01/03) medication use data from the DCI national database was obtained. Data collected included patient demographics, reason for and duration of ESRD, and medication listed on profile. All medications were classified similar to the USRDS and by where taken (clinic vs home). Medication prescribing patterns were compared between DCI and USRDS databases. Comparisons between age groups (<65 and >or=65 years) and diabetic status [diabetes mellitus (DM) vs non-DM] were made.
There were 128 477 medication orders categorized in 10 474 patients. DCI patient demographics were similar to present USRDS patients except for fewer Hispanics (P<0.001). Patients were prescribed 12.3+/-5.0 (median 12) different medications (2.6+/-1.4 clinic medications and 10.0+/-4.5 home medications). This is higher than reported by USRDS (median 9 medications). Patient age did not influence number of medications used (P = 0.54). DM patients are prescribed more medications than non-DM (13.3+/-5.0 DM vs 11.6+/-4.8 non-DM; P<0.00001). All medication class prescribing patterns were markedly different.
The data suggest that medication prescribing patterns in HD patients have changed. The audit identified appropriate and questionable prescribing patterns. Various prescribing patterns identified areas for improvement in care (e.g. increased use of aspirin, beta-blockers and hyperlipidaemia medications) and areas requiring further investigation (e.g. high use of anti-acid, benzodiazepine and non-aluminum/non-calcium phosphate-binding medications).
终末期肾病(ESRD)患者需服用多种药物。美国肾脏数据系统(USRDS)于1998年报告了用药模式。自那时起,引入了几种新药物、治疗指南和建议。目的是分析和比较透析诊所公司(DCI)数据库与USRDS报告中血液透析(HD)患者的用药模式。
获取DCI全国数据库的点患病率(2003年1月1日)用药数据。收集的数据包括患者人口统计学信息、ESRD的病因和病程以及病历上列出的药物。所有药物均按照与USRDS类似的方式分类,并按用药地点(诊所与家中)分类。比较DCI和USRDS数据库之间的用药模式。对年龄组(<65岁和≥65岁)和糖尿病状态[糖尿病(DM)与非糖尿病(non-DM)]进行比较。
10474例患者中有128477份用药医嘱。DCI患者的人口统计学特征与当前USRDS患者相似,但西班牙裔患者较少(P<0.001)。患者被开具12.3±5.0(中位数12)种不同药物(2.6±1.4种诊所用药和10.0±4.5种家庭用药)。这高于USRDS报告的数据(中位数9种药物)。患者年龄不影响用药数量(P = 0.54)。糖尿病患者比非糖尿病患者开具的药物更多(糖尿病患者为13.3±5.0种,非糖尿病患者为11.6±4.8种;P<0.00001)。所有药物类别用药模式均明显不同。
数据表明HD患者的用药模式已发生变化。审计确定了合适和有问题的用药模式。各种用药模式确定了护理方面需要改进的领域(例如增加阿司匹林、β受体阻滞剂和高脂血症药物的使用)以及需要进一步调查的领域(例如抗酸药、苯二氮䓬类药物和非铝/非钙磷结合药物的高使用量)。