Park Cheol Ho, Ko Ye Eun, Heo Ga Young, Kim Bo Yeon, Oh Seong Ju, Han So Young, Park Jung Tak, Han Seung Hyeok, Yoo Tae-Hyun, Kang Shin-Wook, Kim Hyung Woo
Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Kidney Disease Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Institute for Innovation in Digital Healthcare, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 Jan 1;20(1):72-80. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000570. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
A higher medication burden was associated with a higher risk of adverse events in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Medication burden can serve as a clinically relevant risk indicator for cardiovascular events and all-cause death in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.
A high medication burden is associated with adverse outcomes. Although patients with ESKD have a substantial medication burden, the relationship between the number of medications in use and clinical outcomes in these patients remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the prognostic implications of medication burden regarding adverse outcomes in patients with ESKD on maintenance hemodialysis.
We analyzed 29,690 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis who participated in the Periodic Hemodialysis Quality Assessment conducted by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. The exposure of interest was the number of routinely prescribed oral medications. The main outcome was a composite of nonfatal cardiovascular events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) or all-cause death (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCEs]). The secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome.
During a follow-up period of 146,749 person-years (median, 6.0 years), MACCEs occurred in 17,573 patients (59.2%). Higher medication burden was associated with progressively higher incidence of MACCEs (84.7, 107.2, 130.2, and 168.9 events per 1000 person-years in Q1–Q4, respectively). In a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the second, third, and highest quartiles were 1.05 (1.00 to 1.10), 1.12 (1.07 to 1.17), and 1.27 (1.21 to 1.33), respectively, compared with the lowest quartile. In continuous modeling, each increase in the number of medication was associated with a 1.03-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.04) higher risk of the primary outcome.
A high medication burden was independently associated with higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause death in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. These findings suggest that a high medication burden could be a useful indicator of adverse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
接受维持性血液透析的患者中,较高的用药负担与不良事件风险增加相关。用药负担可作为维持性血液透析患者心血管事件和全因死亡的临床相关风险指标。
高用药负担与不良结局相关。尽管终末期肾病(ESKD)患者用药负担很重,但这些患者使用药物数量与临床结局之间的关系仍不明确。因此,本研究旨在调查用药负担对接受维持性血液透析的ESKD患者不良结局的预后影响。
我们分析了29690例参与健康保险审查和评估服务机构进行的定期血液透析质量评估的接受维持性血液透析的患者。感兴趣的暴露因素是常规开具的口服药物数量。主要结局是非致死性心血管事件(非致死性心肌梗死、冠状动脉血运重建、非致死性卒中或因心力衰竭住院)或全因死亡(主要不良心血管和脑血管事件[MACCEs])的复合结局。次要结局是主要结局的各个组成部分。
在146749人年的随访期(中位数为6.0年)内,17573例患者(59.2%)发生了MACCEs。用药负担越高,MACCEs的发生率越高(第一至第四四分位数分别为每1000人年84.7、107.2、130.2和168.9例事件)。在多变量Cox比例风险模型中,与最低四分位数相比,第二、第三和最高四分位数的调整后风险比(95%置信区间)分别为1.05(1.00至1.10)、1.12(1.07至1.17)和1.27(1.21至1.33)。在连续模型中,药物数量每增加一种,主要结局的风险就会增加1.03倍(95%置信区间为1.03至1.04)。
高用药负担与接受维持性血液透析的患者发生不良心血管结局和全因死亡的较高风险独立相关。这些发现表明,高用药负担可能是血液透析患者不良临床结局的一个有用指标。