Mares Alvin S, Rosenheck Robert A
VA Northeast Program Evaluation Center, 950 Cambell Avenue, West Haven, Connecticut 06516, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2004 May;55(5):566-74. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.5.566.
This study examined the various living arrangements among formerly homeless adults with mental illness 12 months after they entered case management.
The study surveyed 5,325 clients who received intensive case management services in the Access to Community Care and Effective Services and Supports (ACCESS) program. Living arrangements 12 months after program entry were classified into six types on the basis of residential setting, the presence of others in the home, and stability (living in the same place for 60 days). Differences in perceived housing quality, unmet housing needs, and overall satisfaction were compared across living arrangements by using analysis of covariance.
One year after entering case management, 37 percent of clients had been independently housed during the previous 60 days (29 percent lived alone in their own place and 8 percent lived with others in their own place), 52 percent had been dependently housed during the previous 60 days (11 percent lived in someone else's place, 10 percent lived in an institution, and 31 percent lived in multiple places), and 11 percent had literally been homeless during the previous 60 days. Clients with less severe mental health and addiction problems at baseline and those in communities that had higher social capital and more affordable housing were more likely to become independently housed, to show greater clinical improvement, and to have greater access to housing services. After the analysis adjusted for potentially confounding factors, independently housed clients were more satisfied with life overall. However, no significant association was found between specific living arrangements and either perceived housing quality or perceived unmet needs for housing.
Living independently was positively associated with satisfaction of life overall, but it was not associated with the perception that the quality of housing was better or that there was less of a need for permanent housing.
本研究调查了曾患有精神疾病的无家可归成年人进入个案管理12个月后的各种居住安排情况。
该研究对5325名在“获得社区护理及有效服务与支持”(ACCESS)项目中接受强化个案管理服务的客户进行了调查。根据居住环境、家中是否有其他人以及稳定性(在同一地方居住60天),将项目进入12个月后的居住安排分为六种类型。通过协方差分析比较了不同居住安排下在住房质量感知、未满足的住房需求和总体满意度方面的差异。
进入个案管理一年后,37%的客户在过去60天内已独立居住(29%独自居住在自己的住所,8%与他人共同居住在自己的住所),52%的客户在过去60天内处于非独立居住状态(11%居住在他人住所,10%居住在机构中,31%居住在多个地方),11%的客户在过去60天内确实无家可归。基线时心理健康和成瘾问题较轻的客户以及所在社区社会资本较高且住房更经济实惠的客户更有可能独立居住,表现出更大的临床改善,并且更容易获得住房服务。在对潜在混杂因素进行分析调整后,独立居住的客户对总体生活更满意。然而,未发现特定居住安排与住房质量感知或未满足的住房需求感知之间存在显著关联。
独立居住与总体生活满意度呈正相关,但与住房质量更好或对永久住房需求更少的认知无关。