• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神疾病患者无家可归终结研究:多伦多住房优先干预措施的 At Home/Chez Soi 随机试验。

Ending homelessness among people with mental illness: the At Home/Chez Soi randomized trial of a Housing First intervention in Toronto.

机构信息

Centre for Research on Inner City Health, The Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St, Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 14;12:787. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-787.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-787
PMID:22978561
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3538556/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The At Home/Chez Soi (AH/CS) Project is a randomized controlled trial of a Housing First intervention to meet the needs of homeless individuals with mental illness in five cities across Canada. The objectives of this paper are to examine the approach to participant recruitment and community engagement at the Toronto site of the AH/CS Project, and to describe the baseline demographics of participants in Toronto.

METHODS

Homeless individuals (n = 575) with either high needs (n = 197) or moderate needs (n = 378) for mental health support were recruited through service providers in the city of Toronto. Participants were randomized to Housing First interventions or Treatment as Usual (control) groups. Housing First interventions were offered at two different mental health service delivery levels: Assertive Community Treatment for high needs participants and Intensive Case Management for moderate needs participants. Demographic data were collected via quantitative questionnaires at baseline interviews.

RESULTS

The effectiveness of the recruitment strategy was influenced by a carefully designed referral system, targeted recruitment of specific groups, and an extensive network of pre-existing services. Community members, potential participants, service providers, and other stakeholders were engaged through active outreach and information sessions. Challenges related to the need for different sectors to work together were resolved through team building strategies. Randomization produced similar demographic, mental health, cognitive and functional impairment characteristics in the intervention and control groups for both the high needs and moderate needs groups. The majority of participants were male (69%), aged >40 years (53%), single/never married (69%), without dependent children (71%), born in Canada (54%), and non-white (64%). Many participants had substance dependence (38%), psychotic disorder (37%), major depressive episode (36%), alcohol dependence (29%), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (23%), and mood disorder with psychotic features (21%). More than two-thirds of the participants (65%) indicated some level of suicidality.

CONCLUSIONS

Recruitment at the Toronto site of AH/CS project produced a sample of participants that reflects the diverse demographics of the target population. This study will provide much needed data on how to best address the issue of homelessness and mental illness in Canada.

摘要

背景

“居家/安家(AH/CS)项目”是一项针对住房优先干预措施的随机对照试验,旨在满足加拿大五个城市无家可归的精神病患者的需求。本文的目的是探讨多伦多 AH/CS 项目的参与者招募和社区参与方法,并描述多伦多参与者的基线人口统计学特征。

方法

通过多伦多市的服务提供商,招募了 575 名有高需求(197 名)或中需求(378 名)精神健康支持需求的无家可归者。参与者被随机分配到住房优先干预组或常规治疗(对照组)组。住房优先干预措施在两个不同的精神卫生服务提供水平上提供:高需求参与者提供积极社区治疗,中需求参与者提供强化个案管理。通过基线访谈的定量问卷收集人口统计学数据。

结果

精心设计的转诊系统、有针对性地招募特定群体以及广泛的现有服务网络影响了招募策略的有效性。通过积极的外展和信息会议,让社区成员、潜在参与者、服务提供者和其他利益攸关方参与进来。需要不同部门合作的挑战通过团队建设策略得到解决。对于高需求和中需求组的干预组和对照组,随机分组产生了相似的人口统计学、心理健康、认知和功能障碍特征。大多数参与者为男性(69%),年龄>40 岁(53%),单身/未婚(69%),无子女(71%),在加拿大出生(54%),非白人(64%)。许多参与者有物质依赖(38%)、精神病性障碍(37%)、重性抑郁发作(36%)、酒精依赖(29%)、创伤后应激障碍(23%)和心境障碍伴精神病性特征(21%)。超过三分之二的参与者(65%)表示有一定程度的自杀意念。

结论

多伦多 AH/CS 项目的招募工作产生了一个反映目标人群多样化人口统计学特征的参与者样本。本研究将提供有关如何在加拿大最好地解决无家可归和精神疾病问题的急需数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f780/3538556/5d4b1f6db66c/1471-2458-12-787-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f780/3538556/5d4b1f6db66c/1471-2458-12-787-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f780/3538556/5d4b1f6db66c/1471-2458-12-787-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Ending homelessness among people with mental illness: the At Home/Chez Soi randomized trial of a Housing First intervention in Toronto.精神疾病患者无家可归终结研究:多伦多住房优先干预措施的 At Home/Chez Soi 随机试验。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 14;12:787. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-787.
2
Long-term effects of rent supplements and mental health support services on housing and health outcomes of homeless adults with mental illness: extension study of the At Home/Chez Soi randomised controlled trial.租金补贴和心理健康支持服务对患有精神疾病的无家可归成年人住房和健康状况的长期影响:“在家/在自己家”随机对照试验的扩展研究
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;6(11):915-925. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30371-2. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
3
Vancouver At Home: pragmatic randomized trials investigating Housing First for homeless and mentally ill adults.温哥华居家项目:针对无家可归且患有精神疾病的成年人开展的“先住房后服务”模式的务实随机试验。
Trials. 2013 Nov 1;14:365. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-365.
4
How did a Housing First intervention improve health and social outcomes among homeless adults with mental illness in Toronto? Two-year outcomes from a randomised trial.“住房第一”干预措施如何改善多伦多患有精神疾病的无家可归成年人的健康和社会状况?一项随机试验的两年期结果。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 12;6(9):e010581. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010581.
5
Cost-effectiveness of Housing First Intervention With Intensive Case Management Compared With Treatment as Usual for Homeless Adults With Mental Illness: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.住房优先干预联合强化个案管理与常规治疗对无家可归的精神病成年人的成本效益比较:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199782. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9782.
6
Effect of scattered-site housing using rent supplements and intensive case management on housing stability among homeless adults with mental illness: a randomized trial.利用租金补贴和强化个案管理分散安置住房对无家可归的精神病成年人住房稳定性的影响:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2015 Mar 3;313(9):905-15. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1163.
7
Moving from rhetoric to reality: adapting Housing First for homeless individuals with mental illness from ethno-racial groups.从空谈走向实践:为有精神疾病的少数族裔无家可归者实施优先住房策略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct 2;12:345. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-345.
8
Trajectories and mental health-related predictors of perceived discrimination and stigma among homeless adults with mental illness. homeless 精神病患者感知歧视和污名的轨迹和心理健康相关预测因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 27;15(2):e0229385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229385. eCollection 2020.
9
A cross-sectional examination of the mental health of homeless mothers: does the relationship between mothering and mental health vary by duration of homelessness?对无家可归母亲心理健康的横断面调查:母亲身份与心理健康之间的关系是否因无家可归的持续时间而有所不同?
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 8;4(12):e006174. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006174.
10
Housing First for People With Severe Mental Illness Who Are Homeless: A Review of the Research and Findings From the At Home-Chez soi Demonstration Project.为无家可归的重度精神疾病患者提供“住房优先”服务:来自“在家—chez soi”示范项目的研究与结果综述
Can J Psychiatry. 2015 Nov;60(11):467-74. doi: 10.1177/070674371506001102.

引用本文的文献

1
Trajectories of Incarceration Over Six Years Among People with Mental Illness and Experiences of Homelessness: Predictive Factors Among Participants in a Randomized Trial of Housing First: Trajectoires d'incarcération sur six ans chez les personnes atteintes de maladie mentale et ayant connu l'itinérance-Facteurs prédictifs chez les participants à un essai à répartition aléatoire en marge du programme «Logement d'abord».患有精神疾病和有过无家可归经历者六年内的监禁轨迹:“住房优先”随机试验参与者中的预测因素:患有精神疾病和有过流浪经历者六年内的监禁轨迹——“住房优先”计划边缘随机试验参与者中的预测因素
Can J Psychiatry. 2025 Sep 3:7067437251372188. doi: 10.1177/07067437251372188.
2
Testing the theory of change for Housing First: a secondary qualitative analysis of gender differences in the experiences of men and women in the AH/CS trial.检验“住房优先”模式的变革理论:对AH/CS试验中男性和女性经历的性别差异进行二次定性分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 28;15(7):e094840. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094840.

本文引用的文献

1
The At Home/Chez Soi trial protocol: a pragmatic, multi-site, randomised controlled trial of a Housing First intervention for homeless individuals with mental illness in five Canadian cities.“在家/在自己家中”试验方案:一项针对加拿大五个城市患有精神疾病的无家可归者的“住房优先”干预措施的务实、多地点随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2011 Nov 14;1(2):e000323. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000323. Print 2011.
2
Access to primary health care among homeless adults in Toronto, Canada: results from the Street Health survey.加拿大多伦多无家可归成年人获得初级医疗保健的情况:街头健康调查结果
Open Med. 2011;5(2):e94-e103. Epub 2011 May 24.
3
Assessing the mental health service needs of the homeless: a level-of-care approach.
3
Bounding systems: A qualitative study exploring healthcare coordination between the emergency youth shelter system and health system in Toronto, Canada.边界系统:一项在加拿大多伦多探索急诊青年庇护系统和卫生系统之间医疗协调的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 21;19(6):e0303655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303655. eCollection 2024.
4
Changes in Health Care Utilization and Associated Costs After Supportive Housing Placement by an Urban Community Mental Health Center.城市社区心理健康中心安置支持性住房后医疗保健利用情况及相关成本的变化
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Nov;59(8):1578-1587. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01146-6. Epub 2023 May 29.
5
Exploring the effect of case management in homelessness per components: A systematic review of effectiveness and implementation, with meta-analysis and thematic synthesis.按组成部分探究个案管理在解决无家可归问题中的效果:一项关于有效性与实施情况的系统评价,并进行荟萃分析和主题综合分析。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 May 17;19(2):e1329. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1329. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
A comprehensive review of prioritised interventions to improve the health and wellbeing of persons with lived experience of homelessness.对改善有过无家可归经历者的健康和福祉的优先干预措施的全面综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 24;17(2):e1154. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1154. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Public Health Interventions to Address Housing and Mental Health amongst Migrants from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds Living in High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.针对高收入国家中来自文化和语言背景多样化的移民的住房和心理健康问题的公共卫生干预措施:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 16;19(24):16946. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416946.
8
Providing Housing First services for an underserved population during the early wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.在 COVID-19 大流行早期为服务不足的人群提供住房优先服务:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278459. eCollection 2022.
9
Determinants of Hospital Use and Physician Services Among Adults With a History of Homelessness.有过无家可归经历的成年人中住院治疗和医生服务的决定因素
Health Serv Insights. 2022 Oct 26;15:11786329221127150. doi: 10.1177/11786329221127150. eCollection 2022.
10
Using Concept Mapping to Define Indigenous Housing First in Hamilton, Ontario.使用概念映射定义安大略省汉密尔顿的原住民优先入住住房。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 28;19(19):12374. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912374.
评估无家可归者的心理健康服务需求:一种照护级别方法。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Aug;21(3):1031-45. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0334.
4
Universal health insurance and health care access for homeless persons.全民健康保险与无家可归者的医疗服务可及性。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Aug;100(8):1454-61. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.182022. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
5
Effect of full-service partnerships on homelessness, use and costs of mental health services, and quality of life among adults with serious mental illness.全方位服务伙伴关系对严重精神疾病成年患者的无家可归状况、心理健康服务的使用与成本以及生活质量的影响。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;67(6):645-52. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.56.
6
Improving pathways into mental health care for black and ethnic minority groups: a systematic review of the grey literature.改善黑人和少数族裔群体获得心理健康护理的途径:灰色文献系统评价。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2009;21(5):439-49. doi: 10.1080/09540260802204105.
7
Fundamental Causes of Housing Loss among Persons Diagnosed with Serious and Persistent Mental Illness: A Theoretically Guided Test.被诊断患有严重持续性精神疾病者住房丧失的根本原因:一项理论导向性测试
Asian J Psychiatr. 2009 Dec 1;2(4):132. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2009.10.006.
8
DSM-IH-R Psychotic Disorders: procedural validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Concordance and causes for discordance with the CIDI.DSM-IH-R 精神病障碍:Mini 国际神经精神访谈 (MINI) 的程序有效性。与 CIDI 的一致性和不一致性的原因。
Eur Psychiatry. 1998;13(1):26-34. doi: 10.1016/S0924-9338(97)86748-X.
9
The health of homeless immigrants.无家可归移民的健康状况。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Nov;63(11):943-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.088468. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
10
Adolescent risk behaviours and psychological distress across immigrant generations.不同移民代际的青少年风险行为与心理困扰
Can J Public Health. 2009 May-Jun;100(3):221-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03405545.