Davidson Megan, Keating Jennifer L, Eyres Sophie
School of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Mar 1;29(5):586-94. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000103346.38557.73.
A prospective repeated measures design was used to produce a back-specific version of the Short Form-36 Physical Functioning scale (SF-36 PF) by Rasch analysis of a pool of items from the SF-36 PF, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.
To identify items for a back-specific version of the SF-36 PF scale and to compare the psychometric properties of the new version with the original 10-item scale.
Adequate assessment of patient function requires the administration of a generic and a condition-specific questionnaire. A back-specific version of the SF-36 PF would facilitate comprehensive patient assessment in the clinical setting.
Consecutive patients with low back pain presenting for physiotherapy treatment were recruited at three public hospitals, three community health services, and four private practices. Patients completed questionnaires on two occasions 6 weeks apart.
A scale of 18 items showed a better fit to the Rasch model than the original SF-36 PF scale. Items in the original scale that had a poor fit (INFIT/OUTFIT statistics outside the range 0.7-1.3) showed an acceptable fit in the new scale. The augmented scale had comparable reliability and improved responsiveness to the original 10-item SF-36 PF scale. The minimum detectable change (90% confidence) and the minimum clinically important difference were 12 points. Floor and ceiling effects were practically eliminated. The psychometric properties of the new scale were comparable to those of the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire.
The Low-Back SF-36 PF18 comprises the 10-item SF-36 PF scale and four items each from the Oswestry and Quebec back pain questionnaires. The possible total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better function. The new scale appears to offer advantages over the use of the original scale for the assessment of functioning in patients with low back pain.
采用前瞻性重复测量设计,通过对简短健康调查问卷36项身体功能量表(SF - 36 PF)、奥斯威斯垂残疾问卷和魁北克背痛残疾量表中的一组条目进行拉施分析,编制特定于背部的SF - 36 PF量表版本。
确定特定于背部的SF - 36 PF量表的条目,并将新版本的心理测量特性与原始的10条目量表进行比较。
对患者功能进行充分评估需要使用通用问卷和特定疾病问卷。特定于背部的SF - 36 PF版本将有助于在临床环境中对患者进行全面评估。
在三家公立医院、三个社区卫生服务机构和四个私人诊所招募连续前来接受物理治疗的腰痛患者。患者在相隔6周的两个时间点完成问卷。
一个18条目的量表比原始的SF - 36 PF量表更符合拉施模型。原始量表中拟合不佳(内拟合/外拟合统计量超出0.7 - 1.3范围)的条目在新量表中显示出可接受的拟合度。扩充后的量表与原始的10条目SF - 36 PF量表具有相当的信度,且反应度有所提高。最小可检测变化(90%置信度)和最小临床重要差异为12分。地板效应和天花板效应几乎消除。新量表的心理测量特性与奥斯威斯垂残疾问卷相当。
下背部SF - 36 PF18量表由10条目SF - 36 PF量表以及来自奥斯威斯垂和魁北克背痛问卷的各4个条目组成。可能的总分范围为0至100分,分数越高表明功能越好。对于评估腰痛患者的功能,新量表似乎比使用原始量表具有优势。