Babu R, Turner A, Nicholls G, Spicer R D
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Bristol, BS2 8BJ, UK.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2004 May;20(5):369-71. doi: 10.1007/s00383-002-0819-y. Epub 2004 May 5.
Catheter-related sepsis (CRS) is a major cause of morbidity in patients receiving chemotherapy and prolonged parenteral nutrition. To determine whether avoiding emergency insertions by using a planned elective list and adopting a 'no-touch' technique has a role in reducing CRS, all cuffed central venous catheters inserted by the open method between 1999 and 2000 were prospectively followed for a total duration of 12 months. The incidence of early sepsis (within 30 catheter days) that could be attributed to surgical factors was studied. CRS was defined as the presence of any two of the following: (1) signs of clinical sepsis without an obvious focus; (2) positive cultures in blood obtained from the catheter; and (3) clinical improvement following removal. A total of 146 catheters were inserted in 130 patients; 15 had a second and 1 had a third catheter inserted. Early CRS was encountered in 13 cases (9%); 95 catheters were inserted on an elective list and 51 on an emergency basis. The distributions of age, sex, number of lumens, neutrophil count, and underlying diagnosis were similar between the groups. There was no significant difference (P = 1) between elective (9/95) and emergency (4/51) insertions. A total of 47 catheters were inserted by the 'no-touch' technique and 48 by the manual technique. There was no significant difference in early sepsis (P = 0.7) between the two techniques (6/47 vs 3/48). Thus avoiding emergency insertion or adopting a 'no-touch' technique does not reduce early CRS. Larger prospective studies are warranted to identify surgical risk factors.
导管相关脓毒症(CRS)是接受化疗和长期肠外营养患者发病的主要原因。为了确定通过使用计划性择期插管清单和采用“无接触”技术避免急诊插管是否对降低CRS有作用,对1999年至2000年间通过开放方法插入的所有带 cuff 的中心静脉导管进行了为期12个月的前瞻性随访。研究了可归因于手术因素的早期脓毒症(导管置入后30天内)的发生率。CRS定义为存在以下任意两项:(1)无明显病灶的临床脓毒症体征;(2)从导管采集的血培养阳性;(3)拔除导管后临床症状改善。130例患者共插入146根导管;15例患者插入了第二根导管,1例患者插入了第三根导管。13例(9%)发生早期CRS;95根导管通过择期清单插入,51根为急诊插入。两组患者的年龄、性别、管腔数量、中性粒细胞计数和基础诊断分布相似。择期插入(9/95)和急诊插入(4/51)之间无显著差异(P = 1)。共47根导管通过“无接触”技术插入,48根通过手工技术插入。两种技术在早期脓毒症发生率上无显著差异(P = 0.7)(6/47 vs 3/48)。因此,避免急诊插入或采用“无接触”技术并不能降低早期CRS。需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究以确定手术风险因素。