Suppr超能文献

抗菌粘结未能预防中心静脉导管相关感染和败血症。

Failure of antiseptic bonding to prevent central venous catheter-related infection and sepsis.

作者信息

Ciresi D L, Albrecht R M, Volkers P A, Scholten D J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Butterworth Hospital, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 1996 Aug;62(8):641-6.

PMID:8712561
Abstract

Infection associated with the use of triple lumen catheters in hospitals is a frequent and serious complication. The prevailing hypothesis for the origin of catheter-related infection (CRI) is bacterial colonization and subsequent infection of the skin insertion site and catheter interface. The recently released ARROWgard catheter contains a bonded synergistic combination of silver sulfadiazine and chlorhexidine, which is thought to render the catheter resistant to bacterial colonization and subsequent sepsis. The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of CRI and catheter-related sepsis (CRS) between a standard triple lumen catheter and ARROWgard antiseptic coated catheter in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN). A randomized, prospective clinical trial was conducted at a community referral center from January 1993 through April 1994. One-hundred-ninety-one patients with need for TPN were randomized to receive either the ARROWgard or a standard triple lumen catheter placed under a strict sterile protocol. CRI was defined as >/= 15 colony forming units by semiquantitative culture technique of the catheter tip or intracutaneous segment. CRS was defined as growth of the same organism on the catheter and at least one peripheral blood culture. All catheters were cultured. Ninety-two patients received the ARROWgard catheter, and 99 patients received the standard catheter. There were no differences between the average age, sex, length of hospital stay, days on TPN, number of catheters/patient, indications for TPN, primary diagnoses, or duration of the central line between the two groups. The overall rate of CRI was 11.5 per cent, and CRS was 8.4 per cent in this study. The rate of CRI for the ARROWgard was 10.9 per cent, compared with 12.9 per cent for the standard catheter (P = NS). The rate of CRS for the ARROWgard was 8.7 per cent, compared with 8.1 per cent for the standard catheter (P = NS). The coating of central venous catheters with silver sulfadiazine and chlorhexidine does not reduce the rate CRI or CRS when compared with standard central venous catheters in patients receiving TPN.

摘要

医院中与使用三腔导管相关的感染是一种常见且严重的并发症。关于导管相关感染(CRI)起源的主流假说是细菌在皮肤插入部位和导管接口处定植并随后引发感染。最近推出的ARROWgard导管含有磺胺嘧啶银和洗必泰的结合增效组合,据认为该组合可使导管抵抗细菌定植及随后的败血症。本研究的目的是比较在接受全胃肠外营养(TPN)的患者中,标准三腔导管与ARROWgard抗菌涂层导管之间CRI和导管相关败血症(CRS)的发生率。1993年1月至1994年4月在一个社区转诊中心进行了一项随机、前瞻性临床试验。191例需要TPN的患者被随机分配,分别接受ARROWgard导管或按照严格无菌方案放置的标准三腔导管。CRI定义为通过导管尖端或皮内段的半定量培养技术培养出≥15个菌落形成单位。CRS定义为在导管和至少一份外周血培养物中培养出相同的微生物。所有导管均进行培养。92例患者接受了ARROWgard导管,99例患者接受了标准导管。两组在平均年龄、性别、住院时间、接受TPN的天数、每位患者的导管数量、TPN的适应证、主要诊断或中心静脉置管持续时间方面均无差异。本研究中CRI的总体发生率为11.5%,CRS为8.4%。ARROWgard导管的CRI发生率为10.9%,而标准导管为12.9%(P=无显著性差异)。ARROWgard导管的CRS发生率为8.7%,标准导管为8.1%(P=无显著性差异)。与接受TPN的患者使用的标准中心静脉导管相比,用磺胺嘧啶银和洗必泰涂层的中心静脉导管并不能降低CRI或CRS的发生率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验