• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伦理决策过程:一个示例

The ethical decision making process: a demonstration.

作者信息

Ogershok Theresa

机构信息

Otterbein College of Nursing, USA.

出版信息

Ohio Nurses Rev. 2002 Aug;77(7):14-5.

PMID:15134014
Abstract

Two issues identified from the scenario have been explored using the Ethical Decision Making Tree. Now look at some of the other issues identified earlier in this article work through the decision-making process using the Ethical Decision Making Tree. In looking at the use of experimental or futile care, what information would you need to gather and analyze? What personal values and moral positions need to be considered? Based on the previous two steps, what are the options? What is your decision and course of action? How are you going to evaluate the action taken to see if it worked or if other actions need to be taken? Remember, the solution is not what is best for you but what is best for the patient at this point of time.

摘要

已使用道德决策树对该场景中确定的两个问题进行了探讨。现在来看看本文前面确定的其他一些问题,通过道德决策树来进行决策过程。在考虑使用实验性或无效治疗时,你需要收集和分析哪些信息?需要考虑哪些个人价值观和道德立场?基于前两个步骤,有哪些选择?你的决策和行动方案是什么?你将如何评估所采取的行动是否有效,或者是否需要采取其他行动?记住,解决方案不是对你最有利的,而是在此时对患者最有利的。

相似文献

1
The ethical decision making process: a demonstration.伦理决策过程:一个示例
Ohio Nurses Rev. 2002 Aug;77(7):14-5.
2
Ethical decision-making: blending the voice of reason and the voice of compassion.
Pa Nurse. 2007 Mar;62(1):14-5.
3
The content of advocacy in procedural pain care - patients' and nurses' perspectives.程序性疼痛护理中的支持内容——患者和护士的观点
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Dec;64(5):504-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04817.x.
4
Dementia diagnosis and disclosure: a dilemma in practice.痴呆症的诊断与告知:实践中的两难困境。
J Clin Nurs. 2004 Mar;13(3a):22-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00922.x.
5
Personal conscience and the problem of moral certitude.个人良知与道德确信问题。
Nurs Clin North Am. 2009 Dec;44(4):407-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2009.07.008.
6
Towards understanding the nature of conflict of interest and its application to the discipline of nursing.旨在理解利益冲突的本质及其在护理学科中的应用。
Nurs Philos. 2009 Oct;10(4):253-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2009.00412.x.
7
Respect in critical care: a foundational ethical principle.重症监护中的尊重:一项基本伦理原则。
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2007 Apr-Jun;18(2):149-56. doi: 10.1097/01.AACN.0000269258.14418.1e.
8
Nursing involvement in euthanasia: a 'nursing-as-healing-praxis' approach.护理在安乐死中的参与:一种“护理即治愈实践”的方法。
Nurs Philos. 2007 Jul;8(3):176-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2007.00313.x.
9
On paternalism, autonomy and best interests: telling the (competent) aged-care resident what they want to know.论家长作风、自主性与最大利益:告知(有行为能力的)老年护理院居民他们想知道的事情。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2006 Jun;12(3):166-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2006.00565.x.
10
Nurses' conceptions of decision making concerning life-sustaining treatment.护士对维持生命治疗决策的看法。
Nurs Ethics. 2008 Mar;15(2):160-73. doi: 10.1177/0969733007086014.