Hébert Paul C, McDonald Bernard J, Tinmouth Alan
University of Ottawa Centre for Transfusion Research and the Clinical Epidemiology Program of the Ottawa Health Research Institute, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital (General Campus), Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada.
Crit Care Clin. 2004 Apr;20(2):225-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2003.12.006.
Despite the frequent use of red cell transfusions, only one large randomized trial has examined red cell administration perioperative and in the critical care setting. However, the TRICC Trial does not provide sufficient evidence to determine optimal transfusion practice in postoperative care, in critically ill children, or in patients with a myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndromes. In addition, most transfusion practice guidelines published before the completion of the TRICC Trial are now dated and need to have expert opinion informed by solid evidence in diverse clinical settings. In the next several years,several randomized trials will provide additional evidence in support of bedside decision-making. For example, two transfusion studies will be evaluating transfusion triggers, including one in premature infants and the other in critically ill children. At this juncture, high-quality clinical evidence is not yet available for many decisions related to red cell transfusions. We anticipate that risks and benefits of red cells and alternatives will be elucidated in the coming years.
尽管红细胞输血的使用频率很高,但只有一项大型随机试验研究了围手术期和重症监护环境中的红细胞输注情况。然而,TRICC试验并未提供足够的证据来确定术后护理、重症儿童或心肌梗死或急性冠状动脉综合征患者的最佳输血方案。此外,在TRICC试验完成之前发布的大多数输血实践指南现在已经过时,需要在不同临床环境中依据确凿证据的专家意见。在未来几年,几项随机试验将提供更多支持床边决策的证据。例如,两项输血研究将评估输血触发因素,一项针对早产儿,另一项针对重症儿童。此时此刻,许多与红细胞输血相关的决策尚无高质量的临床证据。我们预计未来几年将阐明红细胞及其替代物的风险和益处。