Suppr超能文献

多层面CT血管造影与导管血管造影在诊断椎动脉夹层中的比较。

Multisection CT angiography compared with catheter angiography in diagnosing vertebral artery dissection.

作者信息

Chen Chi-Jen, Tseng Ying-Chi, Lee Tsong-Hai, Hsu Hui-Ling, See Lai-Chu

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, E-Da Hospital/I-Shou University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 May;25(5):769-74.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Multisection CT angiography is a minimally invasive technique that can provide high-resolution and high-contrast images of the arterial lumen and wall. To our knowledge, the ability of multisection CT angiography in detecting vertebral artery (VA) dissection has never been evaluated. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of a routine, standardized, multisection CT angiographic protocol for the detection of VA dissection.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed multisection CT angiograms of 17 patients with VA dissection and 17 control subjects. The acquisition protocol for multisection CT angiography was 1.25-mm nominal section thickness, a table speed of 7.5 mm per rotation (9.4 mm/s), and a 0.8-second gantry rotation period. Two radiologists assessed the maximum intensity projection and axial source images. The sensitivity and specificity of this technique in depicting VA dissection were determined.

RESULTS

Conventional angiography depicted 15 normal and 19 dissected VAs (including five stenotic, seven occlusive, and seven aneurysmal dissections) in the patient group and 28 normal and six atherosclerotic VAs in the control group. Multisection CT angiography enabled successful diagnosis of all 19 dissected VAs and 48 (98%) of 49 nondissected VAs but misidentified a severe atherosclerotic lesion as an aneurysmal-type dissection. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of multisection CT angiography in diagnosing VA dissection were 100%, 98%, 98.5%, 95%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Multisection CT angiography was a sensitive and accurate technique for the diagnosis of VA dissection.

摘要

背景与目的

多层螺旋CT血管造影术是一种微创技术,能够提供动脉管腔和管壁的高分辨率、高对比度图像。据我们所知,多层螺旋CT血管造影术检测椎动脉(VA)夹层的能力从未得到评估。我们评估了一种常规、标准化的多层螺旋CT血管造影方案检测VA夹层的敏感性和特异性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了17例VA夹层患者和17例对照者的多层螺旋CT血管造影图像。多层螺旋CT血管造影的采集方案为:标称层厚1.25mm,床速每旋转7.5mm(9.4mm/s),机架旋转周期0.8秒。两名放射科医生评估最大密度投影和轴位源图像。确定该技术在描绘VA夹层方面的敏感性和特异性。

结果

常规血管造影显示患者组有15条正常VA和19条夹层VA(包括5条狭窄、7条闭塞和7条动脉瘤样夹层),对照组有28条正常VA和6条动脉粥样硬化VA。多层螺旋CT血管造影能够成功诊断所有19条夹层VA以及49条未夹层VA中的48条(98%),但将一个严重的动脉粥样硬化病变误诊为动脉瘤样夹层。多层螺旋CT血管造影诊断VA夹层的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为100%、98%、98.5%、95%和100%。

结论

多层螺旋CT血管造影是诊断VA夹层的一种敏感且准确的技术。

相似文献

3
CT angiography versus colour-Doppler US in acute dissection of the vertebral artery.
Radiol Med. 2007 Apr;112(3):435-43. doi: 10.1007/s11547-007-0152-6. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
4
Spontaneous vertebral dissection: clinical, conventional angiographic, CT, and MR findings.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996 Mar-Apr;20(2):185-93. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199603000-00004.
5
Intramural hematoma detection by susceptibility-weighted imaging in intracranial vertebral artery dissection.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;36(4):292-8. doi: 10.1159/000354811. Epub 2013 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Carotid artery dissection recanalization: imaging modalities, influencing factors, and therapeutic perspectives.
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 8;16:1624698. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1624698. eCollection 2025.
2
Bilateral carotid dissection due to Eagle syndrome.
Radiol Case Rep. 2023 Dec 17;19(3):927-933. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.11.028. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Prevalence of anatomical variations at the suboccipital (V3) segment of the vertebral artery: a systematic review.
Neuroradiology. 2023 Dec;65(12):1677-1684. doi: 10.1007/s00234-023-03223-9. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
4
The use of SNAP and T1-weighted VISTA in cervical artery dissection.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Jun;29(3):235-242. doi: 10.1177/15910199221082847. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
6
[Spontaneous craniocervical dissection].
Radiologe. 2021 Aug;61(8):729-735. doi: 10.1007/s00117-021-00884-6. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
8
Imaging of Non-atherosclerotic Vasculopathies.
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2020 Oct 13;10:62. doi: 10.25259/JCIS_91_2020. eCollection 2020.
9
A case of multiple Vertebrobasilar artery fenestration misdiagnosed as vertebral artery dissection.
BMC Neurol. 2020 Feb 20;20(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01642-2.
10
Imaging of Carotid Dissection.
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Jan 19;23(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0741-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Spontaneous dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries.
N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 22;344(12):898-906. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103223441206.
2
Magnetic resonance imaging and vertebral artery dissection.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Nov;67(5):691-2. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.67.5.691.
3
MRI and MR angiography of vertebral artery dissection.
Neuroradiology. 1997 May;39(5):329-40. doi: 10.1007/s002340050418.
4
Helical CT for the diagnosis of extracranial internal carotid artery dissection.
Stroke. 1996 Mar;27(3):461-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.3.461.
5
CT angiography: application to the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
Radiology. 1993 Oct;189(1):211-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.189.1.8372196.
7
Magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic CT scan in cervical artery dissections.
Stroke. 1994 Mar;25(3):576-81. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.3.576.
8
Magnetic resonance imaging study of intracranial vertebrobasilar artery dissections.
Stroke. 1994 Mar;25(3):571-5. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.3.571.
9
Dissection of the internal carotid and vertebral arteries: imaging features.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Nov;165(5):1099-104. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.5.7572483.
10
The vertebral artery. Extracranial and intracranial structure.
Arch Neurol. 1972 Nov;27(5):392-6. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1972.00490170024004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验