Pugliese F, Crusco F, Cardaioli G, Tambasco N, Boranga B, Scaroni R, Maselli A, Lupattelli L
Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, AUSL 3 Umbria, Ospedale S. Giovanni Battista, Foligno, Italy.
Radiol Med. 2007 Apr;112(3):435-43. doi: 10.1007/s11547-007-0152-6. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
Conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) still represents the criterion standard for the diagnosis of vertebral artery dissection (VAD), but the main drawbacks of this technique include invasiveness, patient discomfort and risk of complications. We evaluated the potential of multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA) as a noninvasive tool providing high-resolution images of the arterial lumen and wall by comparing the diagnostic accuracy of CTA and colour-Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) in detecting acute VAD.
We retrospectively reviewed 15 cases of VAD in 15 patients (five men and ten women, age range 28-58 years) who came to our attention between August 2001 and September 2005. The diagnosis was made on the basis of appropriate clinical presentation, absence of atherosclerotic disease in the cerebrovascular circulation and evidence of distinctive CT features, which were subsequently confirmed by conventional angiography used as reference standard. All patients with a clinical suspicion of VAD underwent CDUS of the neck vessels prior to CTA. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of CDUS and CTA were expressed as percentages of agreement with the reference angiographic procedure. Interreader concordance for detection of VAD by CTA was calculated with the Cohen K value.
The CDUS examinations revealed ten out of 15 VAD, with a sensitivity of 66%, a specificity of 60%, a positive predictive value of 55.5% and a negative predictive value of 70.5%. In five cases, CDUS revealed nonspecific wall and flow alterations; in eight patients, high resistance obstructive flow; and in two patients, intimal flap with demonstration of the true and false lumen. CTA enabled the correct identification of all 15 VAD. The reported sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 100%, 95%, 93.7% and 100%, respectively. With regard to localisation of VAD, CTA showed 100% correlation with DSA. The differences in CTA and CDUS sensitivity (100% vs 66%), specificity (95% vs 60%), and overall diagnostic accuracy (97% vs 62.8%), assessed by cross tabulations and compared by using the McNemar's two-sided test, were significant (p<0.05).
Multidetector CTA is a sensitive technique for the diagnosis of VAD. Used as a complement to unenhanced brain CT, it has the advantage of being readily available and easy to perform.
传统数字减影血管造影(DSA)仍是诊断椎动脉夹层(VAD)的标准方法,但该技术的主要缺点包括有创性、患者不适以及并发症风险。我们通过比较CT血管造影(CTA)和彩色多普勒超声(CDUS)在检测急性VAD中的诊断准确性,评估了多排CT血管造影作为一种无创工具提供动脉管腔和管壁高分辨率图像的潜力。
我们回顾性分析了2001年8月至2005年9月间引起我们注意的15例VAD患者(5名男性和10名女性,年龄范围28 - 58岁)。诊断基于适当的临床表现、脑血管循环中无动脉粥样硬化疾病以及特征性CT表现的证据,随后通过用作参考标准的传统血管造影进行确认。所有临床怀疑VAD的患者在进行CTA之前均接受了颈部血管的CDUS检查。CDUS和CTA的准确性、敏感性和特异性以与参考血管造影程序一致的百分比表示。通过Cohen K值计算CTA检测VAD的阅片者间一致性。
CDUS检查发现15例VAD中的10例,敏感性为66%,特异性为60%,阳性预测值为55.5%,阴性预测值为70.5%。在5例中CDUS显示非特异性的管壁和血流改变;在8例患者中显示高阻力阻塞性血流;在2例患者中显示内膜瓣及真假腔。CTA能够正确识别所有15例VAD患者。报告的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为100%、95%、93.7%和100%。关于VAD的定位,CTA与DSA显示出100%的相关性差异CTA及CDUS敏感性(100%对66%)、特异性(95%对60%)及总体诊断准确性(97%对62.8%),经交叉表评估并用McNemar双侧检验比较,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)结论:多排CTA是诊断VAD的一种敏感技术。作为未增强脑CT的补充,它具有随时可用且易于操作的优点。
(注:译文中最后一句“差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)结论:多排CTA是诊断VAD的一种敏感技术。作为未增强脑CT的补充,它具有随时可用且易于操作的优点。”表述有些混乱,原文最后一段是先下结论,再阐述优点,译文调整了语序,使其更符合逻辑顺序。)