Zuber M, Meary E, Meder J F, Mas J L
Service de Neurologie, Centre R. Garcin, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.
Stroke. 1994 Mar;25(3):576-81. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.3.576.
The typical magnetic resonance imaging picture of arterial dissection, namely, a narrowed eccentric signal void surrounded by a semilunar signal hyper-intensity (corresponding to the mural hematoma) on T1- and T2-weighted images, has been repeatedly reported, but the sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of cervical dissection is poorly known. Another technique, dynamic computed tomography, may provide evidence of mural hematoma, but there has been no systematic evaluation of this technique. The aims of this study were to assess both the sensitivity of routine 0.5-T magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of a typical picture of cervical artery dissection and the value of dynamic computed tomographic scans to provide evidence of dissecting hematoma.
Fifteen consecutive patients with angiographically confirmed extracranial internal carotid (n = 9) or vertebral (n = 10) dissections were studied using a standardized 0.5-T spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging protocol with axial slices. Twelve of these patients had dynamic computed tomographic scans at the site of the dissection suggested by angiography.
A typical magnetic resonance imaging picture of cervical artery dissection was observed in 12 of 15 (80%) patients and in 13 of 19 (68%) dissected vessels. The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging was higher in internal carotid (78%) than in vertebral (60%) dissections and in stenotic-type dissections (85%) than in occlusive or aneurysmal-type dissections. The dynamic computed tomographic scan showed the mural hematoma in 11 of the 12 (92%) patients and in 12 of 15 (80%) dissected vessels.
Routine 0.5-T magnetic resonance imaging with axial slices is a sensitive technique for the diagnosis of dissection, but in about 20% of patients with cervical artery dissection magnetic resonance imaging will demonstrate no typical abnormality. Dynamic computed tomographic scans are a sensitive neuroimaging procedure to confirm the presence of the mural hematoma, but it needs to be directed by prior angiography.
动脉夹层的典型磁共振成像表现,即在T1加权和T2加权图像上,一个偏心性狭窄的信号缺失区被半月形信号高增强区(对应于壁内血肿)环绕,已有多次报道,但磁共振成像对诊断颈段夹层的敏感性尚不清楚。另一种技术,动态计算机断层扫描,可能提供壁内血肿的证据,但尚未对该技术进行系统评估。本研究的目的是评估常规0.5-T磁共振成像检测颈段动脉夹层典型表现的敏感性,以及动态计算机断层扫描对提供夹层血肿证据的价值。
对15例经血管造影证实的颅外颈内动脉(n = 9)或椎动脉(n = 10)夹层患者,采用标准化的0.5-T自旋回波磁共振成像方案进行轴向切片研究。其中12例患者在血管造影提示的夹层部位进行了动态计算机断层扫描。
15例患者中有12例(80%)、19支夹层血管中有13支(68%)观察到颈段动脉夹层的典型磁共振成像表现。磁共振成像的敏感性在颈内动脉夹层(78%)高于椎动脉夹层(60%),在狭窄型夹层(85%)高于闭塞型或动脉瘤型夹层。动态计算机断层扫描在12例患者中的11例(92%)、15支夹层血管中的12支(80%)显示了壁内血肿。
常规0.5-T轴向切片磁共振成像是诊断夹层的敏感技术,但约20%的颈段动脉夹层患者磁共振成像无典型异常表现。动态计算机断层扫描是确认壁内血肿存在的敏感神经影像学检查方法,但需要血管造影引导。