Suppr超能文献

欧洲喉科学会(ELS)评估嗓音治疗效果基本方案的实施

Implementation of the European Laryngological Society (ELS) basic protocol for assessing voice treatment effect.

作者信息

DeJonckere P H, Crevier-Buchman L, Marie J P, Moerman M, Remacle M, Woisard V

机构信息

University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, PO Box 85500 AZU F.02 504. NL 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2003;124(5):279-83.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

93 patients with various kinds of organic benign voice pathology (vocal fold nodules, polyp, Reinke's oedema, unilateral paralysis, sulcus/scar) and/or with muscle tension dysphonia, were evaluated before and after their voice treatment (phonosurgery with voice therapy, antireflux medication, or voice therapy alone) in order to check the clinical relevance of a basic multidimensional protocol for assessing functional results of voice treatments, as developed by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the ELS.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The protocol has been used in different university voice clinics. It comprises 5 dimensions: Perception: Grade, Breathiness and Roughness from the GRBAS-scale, rated by two experienced judges: a phoniatrician/laryngologist and a speech therapist. Acoustics: Jitter % and Shimmer % computed on a /a:/, at comfortable loudness and pitch. Also Fo-range and softest possible intensity. Videostroboscopy: Glottal closure, regularity, mucosal wave and symmetry, rated separately. Phonation quotient: computed by dividing the vital capacity (ml) by the maximum phonation time (s) (best value of 2x3 trials). Self rating by the patient: voice quality in itself and general social/occupational handicap due to the voice problem rated separately.

RESULTS

Results show that, at group level, the overall effects for each parameter indicate a significant improvement after treatment. However, the correlations between the pre/post changes for the different parameters are weak (low redundancy).

CONCLUSION

The assessment of voice pathology needs to be multidimensional, as these multidimensional informations about voice changes lead to a better understanding of the actual way in which a treatment works.

摘要

目的

对93例患有各种器质性良性嗓音病变(声带小结、息肉、任克氏水肿、单侧麻痹、沟/瘢痕)和/或肌肉紧张性发声障碍的患者,在其嗓音治疗(嗓音外科手术联合嗓音治疗、抗反流药物治疗或单纯嗓音治疗)前后进行评估,以检验由欧洲喉科学会嗓音病学委员会制定的用于评估嗓音治疗功能结果的基本多维方案的临床相关性。

材料与方法

该方案已在不同大学嗓音诊所使用。它包括5个维度:感知:由GRBAS量表中的等级、呼吸音和粗糙音组成,由两名经验丰富的评判者进行评分:一名嗓音病学家/喉科医生和一名言语治疗师。声学:在舒适响度和音高条件下,计算/a:/音的抖动百分比和闪烁百分比。还有基频范围和尽可能柔和的强度。视频频闪喉镜检查:分别对声门闭合、规律性、黏膜波和对称性进行评分。发声商:通过将肺活量(毫升)除以最大发声时间(秒)计算得出(2×3次试验的最佳值)。患者自评:分别对嗓音质量本身以及因嗓音问题导致的总体社会/职业障碍进行评分。

结果

结果显示,在组水平上,每个参数的总体效果表明治疗后有显著改善。然而,不同参数治疗前后变化之间的相关性较弱(冗余度低)。

结论

嗓音病变的评估需要多维进行,因为这些关于嗓音变化的多维信息能更好地理解治疗起作用的实际方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验