Dejonckere P H, Bradley P, Clemente P, Cornut G, Crevier-Buchman L, Friedrich G, Van De Heyning P, Remacle M, Woisard V
Institute of Phoniatrics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, AZU F.02.504, P.O. Box 85500, Nl-3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001 Feb;258(2):77-82. doi: 10.1007/s004050000299.
The proposal of this basic protocol is an attempt to reach better agreement and uniformity concerning the methodology for functional assessment of pathologic voices. The purpose is to allow relevant comparisons with the literature when presenting/publishing the results of voice treatment, e.g. a phonosurgical technique, or a new/improved instrument or procedure for investigating the pathological voice. Meta-analyses of the results of voice treatments are generally limited and may even be impossible owing to the major diversity in the ways functional outcomes are assessed. A multidimensional set of minimal basic measurements suitable for all "common" dysphonias is proposed. It includes five different approaches: perception (grade, roughness, breathiness), videostroboscopy (closure, regularity, mucosal wave and symmetry), acoustics (jitter, shimmer, Fo-range and softest intensity), aerodynamics (phonation quotient), and subjective rating by the patient. The protocol is elaborated on the basis of an exhaustive review of the literature, of the experience of the Committee members, and of plenary discussions within the European Laryngological Society. Instrumentation is kept to a minimum, but it is considered essential for professionals performing phonosurgery.
本基本方案的提出旨在就病理性嗓音功能评估方法达成更好的共识与统一。目的是在展示/发表嗓音治疗结果时,例如一种嗓音外科技术、一种用于研究病理性嗓音的新的/改进的仪器或程序,能够与文献进行相关比较。由于功能结果评估方式的巨大差异,嗓音治疗结果的荟萃分析通常受到限制,甚至可能无法进行。本文提出了一组适用于所有“常见”发声障碍的多维最小基本测量方法。它包括五种不同的方法:感知(分级、粗糙度、气息声)、频闪喉镜检查(闭合、规律性、黏膜波和对称性)、声学(抖动、闪烁、基频范围和最柔和强度)、空气动力学(发声商)以及患者主观评分。该方案是在对文献进行详尽综述、委员会成员的经验以及欧洲喉科学会全体讨论的基础上制定的。仪器设备尽量精简,但对于实施嗓音外科手术的专业人员而言,其被认为是必不可少的。