Craven R M, Vanner R G
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anaesthesia. 2004 Jun;59(6):595-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03735.x.
In this study we developed a model lung to compare the effectiveness of ventilation using four different cricothyrotomy devices. The Ravussin 13G cannula (VBM Medical), the Quicktrach cannula 4 mm ID (VBM Medical), the Melker cannula 6 mm ID (Cook) and a cuffed tracheal tube 6 mm ID were used in turn to ventilate the model lung through a cricothyrotomy over a range of upper airway resistances. The 6 mm cuffed tracheal tube provided consistently good ventilation independent of upper airway resistance. The 6 mm ID Melker device provided at least reasonable and at best very good ventilation, whatever the patency of the upper airway. The Ravussin cannula could ventilate well with the jet ventilator with low upper airway resistance but could not ventilate at all with complete upper airway obstruction. The Quicktrach performed poorly with low upper airway resistance but well with increased upper airway resistance. With its easier insertion, fewer complications compared to a surgical cricothyrotomy, and the ability to use it with a standard anaesthetic circuit, the authors feel that the 6 mm Melker canula is the technique of choice for emergency trans-tracheal ventilation.
在本研究中,我们开发了一种模拟肺模型,以比较使用四种不同环甲膜切开术器械进行通气的效果。依次使用拉维辛13G套管(VBM Medical公司)、内径4mm的快速气管切开套管(VBM Medical公司)、内径6mm的梅尔克尔套管(库克公司)和内径6mm的带套囊气管导管,通过环甲膜切开术在一系列上气道阻力条件下对模拟肺进行通气。内径6mm的带套囊气管导管无论上气道阻力如何,均能持续提供良好的通气效果。内径6mm的梅尔克尔器械无论上气道通畅情况如何,至少能提供合理的通气效果,最佳情况下能提供非常良好的通气效果。拉维辛套管在低上气道阻力时可通过喷射通气良好通气,但在上气道完全阻塞时则完全无法通气。快速气管切开套管在低上气道阻力时表现不佳,但在上气道阻力增加时通气良好。鉴于其插入更容易、与手术环甲膜切开术相比并发症更少,以及能够与标准麻醉回路配合使用,作者认为内径6mm的梅尔克尔套管是紧急经气管通气的首选技术。