Suppr超能文献

支气管封堵器在全身麻醉单肺通气中的作用:一项随机对照试验。

Effects of bronchial blockers on one-lung ventilation in general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trail.

作者信息

Zheng Mengliang, Niu Zhiqiang, Chen Peng, Feng Dawei, Wang Lei, Nie Yu, Wang Benqing, Zhang Zhijun, Shan Shiqiang

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(41):e17387. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017387.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Double-lumen bronchial tubes (DLBT) and bronchial blockers (BB) are commonly used in the anesthesia for clinical thoracic surgery. But there are few systematic clinical comparisons between them. In this study, the effects of BB and DLBT on one-lung ventilation (OLV) are studied.

METHODS

The 200 patients with thoracic tuberculosis undergoing thoracic surgery, were randomly assigned to group A (DLBT) and group B (BB). Intubation time, hemodynamic changes (mean arterial pressure [MAP], heart rate [HR]), and arterial blood gas indicators (arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide [PaCO2], arterial partial pressure of oxygen [PaO2], airway plateau pressure [Pplat], and airway peak pressure [Ppeak]) at 4 time points were recorded. Complications such as hoarseness, pulmonary infection, pharyngalgia, and surgical success rate were also evaluated postoperatively.

RESULTS

Intubation times were shorter in group B. Both MAP and HR in group A were significantly higher 1 minute after intubation than before, but also higher than those in group B. PaO2 levels were lower in both groups during (OLV) than immediately after anesthesia and after two-lung ventilation (TLV), with PaO2 being lower after 60 minutes of OLV than after 20 minutes of OLV. Furthermore, at both points during OLV, PaO2 was lower in group A than in group B. No significant differences in PaCO2 were found between the 2 groups. Ppeak and Pplat were increased in both groups during OLV, with both being higher in group A than in group B. The incidence of postoperative hoarseness, pulmonary infection, and pharyngalgia were lower in group B. There was no significant difference in the success rate of operation between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compare with using DLBT, implementation of BB in general anesthesia has less impact on hemodynamics, PaO2 and airway pressures, and achieves lower incidence of postoperative complication.

摘要

背景

双腔支气管导管(DLBT)和支气管封堵器(BB)常用于临床胸外科手术的麻醉。但两者之间很少有系统的临床比较。本研究旨在探讨BB和DLBT对单肺通气(OLV)的影响。

方法

将200例接受胸外科手术的肺结核患者随机分为A组(DLBT组)和B组(BB组)。记录插管时间、血流动力学变化(平均动脉压[MAP]、心率[HR])以及4个时间点的动脉血气指标(动脉血二氧化碳分压[PaCO2]、动脉血氧分压[PaO2]、气道平台压[Pplat]和气道峰值压[Ppeak])。术后还评估了声音嘶哑、肺部感染、咽痛等并发症以及手术成功率。

结果

B组插管时间较短。A组插管后1分钟的MAP和HR均显著高于插管前,且高于B组。两组在OLV期间的PaO2水平均低于麻醉即刻和双肺通气(TLV)后,且OLV 60分钟后的PaO2低于OLV 20分钟后的。此外,在OLV的两个时间点,A组的PaO2均低于B组。两组间PaCO2无显著差异。两组在OLV期间Ppeak和Pplat均升高,且A组高于B组。B组术后声音嘶哑、肺部感染和咽痛的发生率较低。两组手术成功率无显著差异。

结论

与使用DLBT相比,全身麻醉中使用BB对血流动力学、PaO2和气道压力的影响较小,术后并发症发生率较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4bf/6799619/f88e8918fbc0/medi-98-e17387-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验