Avenell A, Broom J, Brown T J, Poobalan A, Aucott L, Stearns S C, Smith W C S, Jung R T, Campbell M K, Grant A M
Heath Services Unit, University of Aberdeen, UK.
Health Technol Assess. 2004 May;8(21):iii-iv, 1-182. doi: 10.3310/hta8210.
To undertake a systematic review of the long-term effects of obesity treatments on body weight, risk factors for disease, and disease.
The study encompassed three systematic reviews that examined different aspects of obesity treatments. (1) A systematic review of obesity treatments in adults where the methods of the Cochrane Collaboration were applied and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a follow-up of at least 1 year were evaluated. (2) A systematic epidemiological review, where studies were sought on long-term effects of weight loss on morbidity and/or mortality, and examined through epidemiological modelling. (3) A systematic economic review that sought reports with both costs and outcomes of treatment, including recent reports that assessed the cost-effectiveness of pharmaceutical and surgical interventions. A Markov model was also adopted to examine the cost-effectiveness of a low-fat diet and exercise intervention in adults with obesity and impaired glucose tolerance.
The addition of the drugs orlistat or sibutramine was associated with weight loss and generally improved risk factors, apart from diastolic blood pressure for sibutramine. Metformin was associated with decreased mortality after 10 years in obese people with type 2 diabetes. Low-fat diets were associated with continuing weight loss for 3 years and improvements in risk factors, as well as prevention of type 2 diabetes and improved control of hypertension. Insufficient evidence was available to demonstrate the benefits of low calorie or very low calorie diets. The addition of an exercise or behaviour programme to diet was associated with improved weight loss and risk factors for at least 1 year. Studies combining low-fat diets, exercise and behaviour therapy suggested improved hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Family therapy was associated with improved weight loss for 2 years compared to individual therapy. There was insufficient evidence to conclude that individual therapy was more beneficial than group therapy. Weight lost more quickly (within 1 year), from the epidemiology review, may be more beneficial with respect to the risk of mortality. The effects of intentional weight loss need further investigation. Weight loss from surgical and non-surgical interventions for people suffering from obesity was associated with decreased risk of development of diabetes, and a reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol and blood pressure, in the long term. Targeting high-risk individuals with drugs or surgery was likely to result in a cost per additional life-year or quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of no more than 13,000 British pounds. There was also suggestive evidence of cost saving from treatment of people with type 2 diabetes with metformin. Targeting surgery on people with severe obesity and impaired glucose tolerance was likely to be more cost-effective at 2329 British pounds per additional life-year. Economic modelling over 6 years for diet and exercise for people with impaired glucose tolerance was associated with a high initial cost per additional QALY, but by the sixth year the cost per QALY was 13,389 British pounds. Results did not include cost savings from diseases other than diabetes, and therefore may be conservative.
The drugs orlistat and sibutramine appear beneficial for the treatment of adults with obesity, and metformin for obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Exercise and/or behaviour therapy appear to improve weight loss when added to diet. Low-fat diets with exercise, or with exercise and behaviour therapy are associated with the prevention of type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Long-term weight loss in epidemiological studies was associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes, and may be beneficial for cardiovascular disease. Low-fat diets and exercise interventions in individuals at risk of obesity-related illness are of comparable cost to drug treatments. Long-term pragmatic RCTs of obesity treatments in populations with obesity-related illness or at high risk of developing such illness are needed (to include an evaluation of risk factors, morbidity, quality of life and economic evaluations). Drug trials that include dietary advice, plus exercise and/or behaviour therapy are also needed. Research exploring effective types of exercise, diet or behaviour and also interventions to prevent obesity in adults is required.
对肥胖治疗对体重、疾病风险因素和疾病的长期影响进行系统评价。
该研究包括三项系统评价,分别考察肥胖治疗的不同方面。(1)对成人肥胖治疗进行系统评价,应用Cochrane协作网的方法,评估随访至少1年的随机对照试验(RCT)。(2)进行系统流行病学评价,寻找关于体重减轻对发病率和/或死亡率的长期影响的研究,并通过流行病学建模进行考察。(3)进行系统经济学评价,寻找包含治疗成本和结果的报告,包括最近评估药物和手术干预成本效益的报告。还采用马尔可夫模型来考察低脂饮食和运动干预对肥胖且糖耐量受损的成年人的成本效益。
添加药物奥利司他或西布曲明与体重减轻相关,除西布曲明对舒张压外,一般还能改善风险因素。二甲双胍与2型糖尿病肥胖患者10年后死亡率降低相关。低脂饮食与持续3年的体重减轻、风险因素改善、2型糖尿病预防以及高血压控制改善相关。没有足够证据证明低热量或极低热量饮食的益处。在饮食基础上增加运动或行为计划与至少1年的体重减轻改善和风险因素改善相关。结合低脂饮食、运动和行为疗法的研究表明高血压和心血管疾病有所改善。与个体治疗相比,家庭治疗与2年的体重减轻改善相关。没有足够证据得出个体治疗比团体治疗更有益的结论。从流行病学评价来看,在1年内更快减轻的体重可能在死亡率风险方面更有益。有意减肥的效果需要进一步研究。肥胖患者接受手术和非手术干预后的体重减轻与糖尿病发病风险降低以及长期低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、总胆固醇和血压降低相关。针对高危个体使用药物或手术治疗,每增加一个生命年或质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本可能不超过13000英镑。也有提示性证据表明二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病患者可节省成本。针对严重肥胖且糖耐量受损的患者进行手术治疗,每增加一个生命年的成本效益可能更高,为2329英镑。对糖耐量受损患者进行6年的饮食和运动经济学建模显示,每增加一个QALY的初始成本较高,但到第6年,每QALY的成本为13389英镑。结果未包括糖尿病以外疾病的成本节省,因此可能较为保守。
药物奥利司他和西布曲明似乎对治疗成人肥胖有益,二甲双胍对肥胖的2型糖尿病患者有益。运动和/或行为疗法在添加到饮食中时似乎能改善体重减轻。结合运动的低脂饮食,或结合运动和行为疗法的低脂饮食与2型糖尿病和高血压的预防相关。流行病学研究中的长期体重减轻与2型糖尿病风险降低相关,可能对心血管疾病有益。对有肥胖相关疾病风险的个体进行低脂饮食和运动干预的成本与药物治疗相当。需要对患有肥胖相关疾病或有发展此类疾病高风险人群进行肥胖治疗的长期实用RCT(包括对风险因素、发病率、生活质量和经济学评价的评估)。还需要包括饮食建议、运动和/或行为疗法的药物试验。需要探索有效的运动、饮食或行为类型以及预防成人肥胖的干预措施的研究。