Kane Michael J, Hambrick David Z, Tuholski Stephen W, Wilhelm Oliver, Payne Tabitha W, Engle Randall W
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):189-217. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189.
A latent-variable study examined whether verbal and visuospatial working memory (WM) capacity measures reflect a primarily domain-general construct by testing 236 participants in 3 span tests each of verbal WM. visuospatial WM, verbal short-term memory (STM), and visuospatial STM. as well as in tests of verbal and spatial reasoning and general fluid intelligence (Gf). Confirmatory' factor analyses and structural equation models indicated that the WM tasks largely reflected a domain-general factor, whereas STM tasks, based on the same stimuli as the WM tasks, were much more domain specific. The WM construct was a strong predictor of Gf and a weaker predictor of domain-specific reasoning, and the reverse was true for the STM construct. The findings support a domain-general view of WM capacity, in which executive-attention processes drive the broad predictive utility of WM span measures, and domain-specific storage and rehearsal processes relate more strongly to domain-specific aspects of complex cognition.
一项潜变量研究通过对236名参与者进行3项言语工作记忆、视觉空间工作记忆、言语短期记忆和视觉空间短期记忆跨度测试,以及言语和空间推理及一般流体智力(Gf)测试,来检验言语和视觉空间工作记忆(WM)容量测量是否主要反映一种领域通用结构。验证性因素分析和结构方程模型表明,工作记忆任务在很大程度上反映了一个领域通用因素,而基于与工作记忆任务相同刺激的短期记忆任务则更具领域特异性。工作记忆结构是Gf的强预测指标,是领域特异性推理的较弱预测指标,而短期记忆结构则相反。这些发现支持了工作记忆容量的领域通用观点,即执行注意过程驱动了工作记忆跨度测量的广泛预测效用,而领域特异性存储和复述过程与复杂认知的领域特异性方面联系更紧密。