Newberry Byron
Baylor University, PO Box 97356, Waco, TX 76798-7356, USA.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2004 Apr;10(2):343-51. doi: 10.1007/s11948-004-0030-8.
This paper briefly summarizes current thinking in engineering ethics education, argues that much of that ethical instruction runs the risk of being only superficially effective, and explores some of the underlying systemic barriers within academia that contribute to this result. This is not to criticize or discourage efforts to improve ethics instruction. Rather it is to point to some more fundamental problems that still must be addressed in order to realize the full potential of enhanced ethics instruction. Issues discussed will include: intellectual engagement versus emotional engagement; the gravitational pull of curricular structures; the nature of engineering faculty; and the "engineer-ization" of ethics.
本文简要总结了工程伦理教育的当前思路,认为许多此类伦理指导存在仅表面有效的风险,并探讨了学术界内部导致这一结果的一些潜在系统性障碍。这并非是批评或阻碍改善伦理指导的努力。相反,这是为了指出一些更根本的问题,为了充分发挥强化伦理指导的潜力,这些问题仍必须得到解决。讨论的问题将包括:智力参与与情感参与;课程结构的引力作用;工程学教师的性质;以及伦理的“工程化”。