• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个受魔方启发的工程伦理教学工具。

A Rubik's Cube-Inspired Pedagogical Tool for Teaching and Learning Engineering Ethics.

机构信息

Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Lingong Road, Ganjingzi Distinct, Dalian, 116024, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Oct 17;30(6):50. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00506-z.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-024-00506-z
PMID:39417895
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11486784/
Abstract

To facilitate engineering students' understanding of engineering ethics and support instructors in developing course content, this study introduces an innovative educational tool drawing inspiration from the Rubik's Cube metaphor. This Engineering Ethics Knowledge Rubik's Cube (EEKRC) integrates six key aspects-ethical theories, codes of ethics, ethical issues, engineering disciplines, stakeholders, and life cycle-identified through an analysis of engineering ethics textbooks and courses across the United States, Singapore, and China. This analysis underpins the selection of the six aspects, reflecting the shared and unique elements of engineering ethics education in these regions. In an engineering ethics course, the EEKRC serves multiple functions: it provides visual support for grasping engineering ethics concepts, acts as a pedagogical guide for both experienced and inexperienced educators in course design, offers a complementary assessment method for evaluating students learning outcomes, and assists as a reference for students engaging in ethical analysis.

摘要

为了帮助工科学生理解工程伦理,并为教师提供开发课程内容的支持,本研究引入了一种创新的教育工具,灵感来自魔方隐喻。这个工程伦理知识魔方(EEKRC)集成了六个关键方面——伦理理论、道德规范、伦理问题、工程学科、利益相关者和生命周期——通过对美国、新加坡和中国的工程伦理教材和课程的分析确定。这种分析是选择这六个方面的基础,反映了这些地区工程伦理教育的共同和独特元素。在工程伦理课程中,EEKRC 具有多种功能:它为理解工程伦理概念提供了直观的支持,为有经验和无经验的教育工作者在课程设计方面提供了教学指导,为评估学生学习成果提供了一种补充的评估方法,并为进行伦理分析的学生提供了参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8d/11486784/3944c67b9089/11948_2024_506_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8d/11486784/c912829d475f/11948_2024_506_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8d/11486784/27f5b99eb3b1/11948_2024_506_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8d/11486784/3944c67b9089/11948_2024_506_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8d/11486784/c912829d475f/11948_2024_506_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8d/11486784/27f5b99eb3b1/11948_2024_506_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8d/11486784/3944c67b9089/11948_2024_506_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A Rubik's Cube-Inspired Pedagogical Tool for Teaching and Learning Engineering Ethics.一个受魔方启发的工程伦理教学工具。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Oct 17;30(6):50. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00506-z.
2
Towards a Psychologically Realist, Culturally Responsive Approach to Engineering Ethics in Global Contexts.迈向全球背景下工程伦理的心理现实主义、文化响应式方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2025 Apr 1;31(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s11948-025-00536-1.
3
Transforming Ethics Education Through a Faculty Learning Community: "I'm Coming Around to Seeing Ethics as Being Maybe as Important as Calculus".通过教师学习共同体转变伦理教育:“我开始认识到,伦理学也许和微积分一样重要”。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Sep 9;30(5):40. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00503-2.
4
Teaching of Medical Ethics Regarding Children, Death and Dying, and Research at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) During Its First Fifty Years.美国军医大学(USUHS)头五十年间关于儿童、死亡与濒死以及研究方面的医学伦理学教学
Mil Med. 2025 Jun 30;190(7-8):1386-1390. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae546.
5
Empathy's Role in Engineering Ethics: Empathizing with One's Self to Others Across the Globe.同理心在工程伦理中的作用:感同身受地理解自己和全球各地的他人。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Nov 25;30(6):57. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00512-1.
6
Effectiveness and experience of arts-based pedagogy among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods systematic review.本科护理专业学生中基于艺术的教学法的有效性与经验:一项混合方法系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Nov;14(11):139-239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003188.
7
Ethical Risk Management Education in Engineering: A Systematic Review.工程领域的道德风险管理教育:一项系统综述。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Apr;23(2):323-350. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9777-y. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
8
Comparing First-Year Engineering Student Conceptions of Ethical Decision-Making to Performance on Standardized Assessments of Ethical Reasoning.将一年级工科学生的道德决策概念与道德推理标准化评估表现进行比较。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Jun 4;30(3):23. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00488-y.
9
A Study on Veterinary Faculty Students' Opinions on Ethics Education and Career Choices: A Case of Ondokuz Mayıs University.兽医专业学生对伦理教育和职业选择的看法研究——以奥登大学为例。
Vet Med Sci. 2024 Nov;10(6):e70086. doi: 10.1002/vms3.70086.
10
What Do We Teach to Engineering Students: Embedded Ethics, Morality, and Politics.我们应该教给工科学生什么:嵌入式伦理、道德和政治。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Feb 19;30(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00469-1.

本文引用的文献

1
A Multi-level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics.工程伦理教育的多层次审视:迈向工程伦理教育的社会技术取向。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Aug 24;27(5):60. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00333-6.
2
Engineering Students as Co-creators in an Ethics of Technology Course.工科学生在技术伦理课程中的共同创造者。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Jul 23;27(4):48. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00326-5.
3
The Ethical Education and Perspectives of Chinese Engineering Students: A Preliminary Investigation and Recommendations.
中国工科学生的伦理教育与观点:初步调查与建议。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):1935-1965. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00108-0. Epub 2019 May 21.
4
A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions.美国工程伦理干预措施的系统文献综述
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):551-583. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
5
Creating visual explanations improves learning.创建可视化解释有助于学习。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2016;1(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s41235-016-0031-6. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
6
Engineering Student's Ethical Awareness and Behavior: A New Motivational Model.工科学生的道德意识与行为:一种新的激励模型
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Aug;23(4):1129-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9814-x. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
7
Ethics Across the Curriculum: Prospects for Broader (and Deeper) Teaching and Learning in Research and Engineering Ethics.贯穿课程的伦理道德:研究和工程伦理教学与学习的更广泛(和更深入)前景。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Dec;25(6):1735-1762. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9797-7. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
8
Comparison of China-US Engineering Ethics Educations in Sino-Western Philosophies of Technology.基于中西方技术哲学的中美工程伦理教育比较
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Dec;21(6):1609-35. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9611-3. Epub 2014 Dec 7.
9
The importance of formative assessment in science and engineering ethics education: some evidence and practical advice.形成性评估在科学与工程伦理教育中的重要性:一些证据与实用建议。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Mar;20(1):249-60. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9428-5. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
10
Gaming, texting, learning? Teaching engineering ethics through students' lived experiences with technology.游戏、短信、学习?通过学生对技术的亲身体验来教授工程伦理。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):1375-93. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9368-5. Epub 2012 May 16.