Cao Gui Hong
Department of Philosophy and the History of Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Brinellvägen 32, 100 44, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Dec;21(6):1609-35. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9611-3. Epub 2014 Dec 7.
Ethics education has become essential in modern engineering. Ethics education in engineering has been increasingly implemented worldwide. It can improve ethical behaviors in technology and engineering design under the guidance of the philosophy of technology. Hence, this study aims to compare China-US engineering ethics education in Sino-Western philosophies of technology by using literature studies, online surveys, observational researches, textual analyses, and comparative methods. In my original theoretical framework and model of input and output for education, six primary variables emerge in the pedagogy: disciplinary statuses, educational goals, instructional contents, didactic models, teaching methods, and edificatory effects. I focus on the similarities and differences of engineering ethics educations between China and the U.S. in Chinese and Western philosophies of technology. In the field of engineering, the U.S. tends toward applied ethics training, whereas China inclines toward practical moral education. The U.S. is the leader, particularly in the amount of money invested and engineering results. China has quickened its pace, focusing specifically on engineering labor input and output. Engineering ethics is a multiplayer game effected at various levels among (a) lower level technicians and engineers, engineering associations, and stockholders; (b) middle ranking engineering ethics education, the ministry of education, the academy of engineering, and the philosophy of technology; and (c) top national and international technological policies. I propose that professional engineering ethics education can play many important roles in reforming engineering social responsibility by international cooperation in societies that are becoming increasingly reliant on engineered devices and systems. Significantly, my proposals contribute to improving engineering ethics education and better-solving engineering ethics issues, thereby maximizing engineering sustainability.
伦理教育在现代工程领域已变得至关重要。工程伦理教育在全球范围内得到了越来越广泛的实施。在技术哲学的指导下,它可以改善技术和工程设计中的伦理行为。因此,本研究旨在通过文献研究、在线调查、观察研究、文本分析和比较方法,比较中美两国在中西技术哲学视角下的工程伦理教育。在我最初的教育输入与输出理论框架和模型中,教学法中出现了六个主要变量:学科地位、教育目标、教学内容、教学模式、教学方法和教育效果。我关注中美两国在中西技术哲学视角下工程伦理教育的异同。在工程领域,美国倾向于应用伦理培训,而中国则倾向于实践道德教育。美国处于领先地位,尤其是在资金投入和工程成果方面。中国加快了步伐,特别注重工程劳动力的投入与产出。工程伦理是一场在多个层面展开的多方博弈,涉及(a)基层技术人员和工程师、工程协会以及股东;(b)中级工程伦理教育、教育部、工程院以及技术哲学;(c)国家和国际层面的顶级技术政策。我认为,在社会对工程设备和系统的依赖日益增加的情况下,专业工程伦理教育可以通过国际合作在改革工程社会责任方面发挥许多重要作用。重要的是,我的提议有助于改善工程伦理教育并更好地解决工程伦理问题,从而实现工程可持续性的最大化。