Paul C L, Redman S, Sanson-Fisher R W
Centre for Health Research & Psych-oncology, Newcastle, NSW 2287, Australia.
Health Educ Res. 2004 Dec;19(6):698-706. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg090. Epub 2004 May 20.
Printed materials have been a primary mode of communication in public health education. Three major approaches to the development of these materials--the application of characteristics identified in the literature, behavioral strategies and marketing strategies--have major implications for both the effectiveness and cost of materials. However, little attention has been directed towards the cost-effectiveness of such approaches. In the present study, three pamphlets were developed using successive addition of each approach: first literature characteristics only ('C' pamphlet), then behavioral strategies ('C + B' pamphlet) and then marketing strategies ('C + B + M' pamphlet). Each pamphlet encouraged women to join a Pap Test Reminder Service (PTRS). Each pamphlet was mailed to a randomly selected sample of 2700 women aged 50-69 years. Registrations with the PTRS were monitored and 420 women in each pamphlet group were surveyed by telephone. It was reported that the 'C + B' and 'C + B + M' pamphlets were significantly more effective than the 'C' pamphlet. The 'C + B' pamphlet was the most cost-effective of the three pamphlets. There were no significant differences between any of the pamphlet groups on acceptability, knowledge or attitudes. It was suggested that the inclusion of behavioral strategies is likely to be a cost-effective approach to the development of printed health education materials.
印刷材料一直是公共卫生教育中的主要传播方式。开发这些材料的三种主要方法——应用文献中确定的特征、行为策略和营销策略——对材料的有效性和成本都有重大影响。然而,很少有人关注这些方法的成本效益。在本研究中,通过依次添加每种方法开发了三本小册子:首先仅采用文献特征(“C”小册子),然后采用行为策略(“C + B”小册子),最后采用营销策略(“C + B + M”小册子)。每本小册子都鼓励女性加入巴氏试验提醒服务(PTRS)。每本小册子都邮寄给了2700名年龄在50 - 69岁之间的随机抽取的女性样本。监测了PTRS的注册情况,并通过电话对每个小册子组中的420名女性进行了调查。据报道,“C + B”和“C + B + M”小册子比“C”小册子显著更有效。“C + B”小册子是三本小册子中最具成本效益的。在可接受性、知识或态度方面,任何小册子组之间都没有显著差异。有人认为,纳入行为策略可能是开发印刷健康教育材料的一种具有成本效益的方法。