Suppr超能文献

通过印刷品和电话进行干预以影响步行的试验。

Trial of print and telephone delivered interventions to influence walking.

作者信息

Humpel N, Marshall A L, Iverson D, Leslie E, Owen N

机构信息

Health and Productivity Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2004 Sep;39(3):635-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.032.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both self-help print materials and telephone-assisted counseling have generally proved useful strategies to increase physical activity. This study examined their effectiveness in an intervention aimed specifically at promoting walking for specific purposes.

METHODS

Participants (n = 399) were randomly allocated to one of two 3-week intervention programs. The Print program comprised multiple mailing of brochures that emphasized walking within the local community environments. The Print plus Telephone program received the same brochures plus three telephone calls. Data collected via mailed self-completed surveys were analyzed by exploring outcomes related to walking for specific purposes.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two programs in any of the walking measures. Both groups significantly increased time reported walking for exercise per week [Print: t(1,277) = -3.50, P < 0.001; Print plus telephone: t(1,106) = -2.44, P < 0.016]. Significantly, more participants in the Print plus Telephone group reported receiving and reading the materials (chi2 = 20.11, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention programs were more successful at increasing walking for exercise than for any other purpose. The addition of brief telephone support was successful in focusing participants' attention on the print materials, but did not result in any additional increase in walking.

摘要

背景

自助印刷材料和电话辅助咨询通常都被证明是增加身体活动的有效策略。本研究考察了它们在一项专门旨在促进特定目的步行的干预措施中的效果。

方法

参与者(n = 399)被随机分配到两个为期3周的干预项目之一。印刷品项目包括多次邮寄强调在当地社区环境中步行的宣传册。印刷品加电话项目除了收到相同的宣传册外,还接到三个电话。通过邮寄自我填写的调查问卷收集的数据,通过探索与特定目的步行相关的结果进行分析。

结果

在任何步行指标上,两个项目之间均无显著差异。两组每周报告的锻炼步行时间均显著增加[印刷品项目:t(1,277) = -3.50,P < 0.001;印刷品加电话项目:t(1,106) = -2.44,P < 0.016]。值得注意的是,印刷品加电话组中更多的参与者报告收到并阅读了材料(χ2 = 20.11,P < 0.0001)。

结论

干预项目在增加锻炼步行方面比在增加其他任何目的的步行方面更成功。增加简短的电话支持成功地使参与者将注意力集中在印刷材料上,但并未导致步行量的进一步增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验