Marcon F, Boei J J W A, Natarajan A T
Department of Toxicogenetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004;104(1-4):72-6. doi: 10.1159/000077468.
The human-Chinese hamster hybrid cell line XR-C1#8, containing human chromosome 8, was used as a model system to investigate the relative importance of cellular enzymatic environment and chromosomal structure for modulating the efficiency of repair of UV-induced DNA damage. The hybrid cells were irradiated with UVC light and the extent of cytogenetic damage, detected as frequencies of sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs), was compared between the human and the hamster chromosomes. The combination of immunofluorescent staining for SCEs and chromosome painting with fluorescence in situ hybridization allowed the simultaneous analysis of SCEs in the human and hamster chromosomes. The aim of the present study was to determine if the differences in biological response to comparable UV treatments observed between human and hamster cells were maintained in the hybrid cells in which human and hamster chromosomes are exposed in the same cellular environment. The analysis of replication time of human chromosome 8 indicated the active status of this chromosome in XR-C1#8 hybrid cells. The frequencies of SCEs for human chromosome 8 and a hamster chromosome of comparable size were 0.35 +/- 0.52, 0.80 +/- 0.73, 1.24 +/- 2.24 and 0.36 +/- 0.12, 0.71 +/- 0.2, 0.97 +/- 0.27, respectively, after irradiation with 0, 5, and 10 J/m2. The persistence of UV-induced SCEs after three cell cycles was also analyzed, both for the human and hamster chromosomes. The observed frequencies of SCEs were 0.40 +/- 0.57, 0.62 +/- 1.05, 0.58 +/- 0.83 and 0.26 +/- 0.08, 0.67 +/- 0.18, 0.69 +/- 0.24, in human and hamster chromosomes respectively, after treatment with 0, 10, and 20 J/m2 of UVC light. No significant differences could be observed between the human and hamster chromosomes. These results suggest that the enzymatic environment of human and hamster cells has the main role, in comparison to the structural organization of human and hamster chromosomes, for determining the different level of repair of UV-induced DNA damage observed in these two species.
