Williams Renee M, Westmorland Muriel G, Schmuck Gloria, MacDermid Joy C
School of Rehabilitation Science, Institute of Applied Health Scienes, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Hand Ther. 2004 Apr-Jun;17(2):267-73. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2004.02.012.
The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the available evidence on workplace rehabilitation interventions for work-related upper extremity disorders (WRUEDs). The literature search identified a total of 811 abstracts from Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and EMBASE databases. The abstracts were independently assessed by four reviewers and 53 full-text articles were identified. Twenty-one studies were then randomly allocated to two pairs of reviewers. Using a 24-item critical appraisal form, the reviewers evaluated the articles for quality and level of evidence. During this process, an additional 13 articles were discarded, resulting in eight studies. The effectiveness of these studies was limited by small sample sizes, lack of standardized outcome measures, and inadequate reporting of interventions and results. The findings of this review indicate that the evidence for workplace interventions for WRUEDs has not been established. This systematic review provides a rigorous analysis of workplace interventions for WRUEDs and emphasizes the need for further research in this area.
本系统评价的目的是评估关于工作场所康复干预措施治疗与工作相关的上肢疾病(WRUEDs)的现有证据。文献检索共从Medline、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)和EMBASE数据库中识别出811篇摘要。这些摘要由四名评审员独立评估,共识别出53篇全文文章。然后将21项研究随机分配给两对评审员。评审员使用一份包含24个条目的批判性评价表格,对文章的质量和证据水平进行评估。在此过程中,又有13篇文章被剔除,最终得到8项研究。这些研究的有效性受到样本量小、缺乏标准化结局指标以及干预措施和结果报告不充分的限制。本评价结果表明,针对WRUEDs的工作场所干预措施的证据尚未确立。本系统评价对WRUEDs的工作场所干预措施进行了严格分析,并强调了该领域进一步研究的必要性。