Boocock M G, McNair P J, Larmer P J, Armstrong B, Collier J, Simmonds M, Garrett N
Physical Rehabilitation Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Occup Environ Med. 2007 May;64(5):291-303. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.025593. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
Considered from medical, social or economic perspectives, the cost of musculoskeletal injuries experienced in the workplace is substantial, and there is a need to identify the most efficacious interventions for their effective prevention, management and rehabilitation. Previous reviews have highlighted the limited number of studies that focus on upper extremity intervention programmes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the findings of primary, secondary and/or tertiary intervention studies for neck/upper extremity conditions undertaken between 1999 and 2004 and to compare these results with those of previous reviews. Relevant studies were retrieved through the use of a systematic approach to literature searching and evaluated using a standardised tool. Evidence was then classified according to a "pattern of evidence" approach. Studies were categorised into subgroups depending on the type of intervention: mechanical exposure interventions; production systems/organisational culture interventions and modifier interventions. 31 intervention studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings provided evidence to support the use of some mechanical and modifier interventions as approaches for preventing and managing neck/upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions and fibromyalgia. Evidence to support the benefits of production systems/organisational culture interventions was found to be lacking. This review identified no single-dimensional or multi-dimensional strategy for intervention that was considered effective across occupational settings. There is limited information to support the establishment of evidence-based guidelines applicable to a number of industrial sectors.
从医学、社会或经济角度来看,工作场所肌肉骨骼损伤的成本巨大,因此有必要确定最有效的干预措施,以对其进行有效预防、管理和康复。以往的综述强调了关注上肢干预项目的研究数量有限。本研究的目的是评估1999年至2004年间针对颈部/上肢疾病进行的一级、二级和/或三级干预研究的结果,并将这些结果与以往综述的结果进行比较。通过系统的文献检索方法检索相关研究,并使用标准化工具进行评估。然后根据“证据模式”方法对证据进行分类。根据干预类型,研究被分为不同的亚组:机械暴露干预;生产系统/组织文化干预和调节因素干预。31项干预研究符合纳入标准。研究结果为支持使用一些机械和调节因素干预措施作为预防和管理颈部/上肢肌肉骨骼疾病及纤维肌痛的方法提供了证据。但发现缺乏支持生产系统/组织文化干预益处的证据。本综述未发现一种在所有职业环境中都被认为有效的单维或多维干预策略。支持制定适用于多个工业部门的循证指南的信息有限。