Suppr超能文献

整体纵向应变:左心室收缩功能的一种新指标。

Global longitudinal strain: a novel index of left ventricular systolic function.

作者信息

Reisner Shimon A, Lysyansky Peter, Agmon Yoram, Mutlak Diab, Lessick Jonathan, Friedman Zvi

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Rambam Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa.

出版信息

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004 Jun;17(6):630-3. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2004.02.011.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Echocardiographic estimation of global left ventricular (LV) function is subjective and time consuming. Our aim was to develop a novel approach for assessment of global LV function from 2-dimensional echocardiographic images

METHODS

Novel computer software for tissue tracking was developed and applied as follows: digital loops were acquired from apical 2-, 3-, and 4-chamber views and a line was loosely traced along the LV endocardium at the frame wherein it was best defined. Around this line, the software selected natural acoustic markers moving with the tissue. Automatic frame-by-frame tracking of these markers during the heart cycle yielded a measure of contractility along the selected region of interest. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and GLS rate (GLSR) were calculated for the entire U-shaped length of LV myocardium (basal, mid, and apical segments of 2 opposite walls in each view). To test this software, computer-derived GLS and GLSR were analyzed by a nonechocardiographer, blinded to the echocardiographic interpretation, in 27 consecutive patients after myocardial infarction (MI) (age 64.4 +/- 12.9 years; 19 men; mean wall-motion score index of 1.79 +/- 0.44) and compared with those obtained in 12 consecutive control patients (age 59.0 +/- 9.7 years; 8 women), with a normal echocardiographic study.

RESULTS

GLS and GLSR, averaged from the 3 apical views, differed significantly in patients post-MI compared with control patients (GLS -14.7 +/- 5.1% vs -24.1 +/- 2.9% and GLSR -0.57 +/- 0.21/s vs -1.02 +/- 0.09/s for patients post-MI vs control patients, respectively; both P <.0001). There was a good linear correlation between the wall-motion score index and the GLS and GLSR (R = 0.68 and R = 0.67, respectively; both P <.0001). A cut-off value for GLS of -21% had 92% sensitivity and 89% specificity and a cut-off value for GLSR -0.9/s had 92% sensitivity and 96% specificity for the detection of patients post-MI.

CONCLUSIONS

GLS and GLSR are novel indices for assessment of global LV function from 2-dimensional echocardiographic images. Early validation studies with the method are suggestive of high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of LV systolic dysfunction in patients post-MI.

摘要

背景

超声心动图对左心室(LV)整体功能的评估主观且耗时。我们的目的是开发一种从二维超声心动图图像评估左心室整体功能的新方法。

方法

开发了一种用于组织追踪的新型计算机软件,并按以下方式应用:从心尖二腔、三腔和四腔视图获取数字环路,并在左心室心内膜最清晰的帧处沿其大致描绘一条线。软件围绕这条线选择随组织移动的自然声学标记。在心动周期中对这些标记进行逐帧自动追踪,得出沿选定感兴趣区域的收缩性测量值。计算左心室心肌整个U形长度(每个视图中两个相对壁的基底、中间和心尖段)的整体纵向应变(GLS)和GLS率(GLSR)。为测试该软件,由一位不了解超声心动图解读结果的非超声心动图专家分析计算机得出的GLS和GLSR,对象为27例连续的心肌梗死(MI)患者(年龄64.4±12.9岁;19例男性;平均壁运动评分指数为1.79±0.44),并与12例连续的超声心动图检查正常的对照患者(年龄59.0±9.7岁;8例女性)的结果进行比较。

结果

与对照患者相比,心肌梗死后患者从三个心尖视图得出的GLS和GLSR平均值有显著差异(心肌梗死后患者的GLS为-14.7±5.1%,对照患者为-24.1±2.9%;心肌梗死后患者的GLSR为-0.57±0.21/s,对照患者为-1.02±0.09/s;P均<0.0001)。壁运动评分指数与GLS和GLSR之间存在良好的线性相关性(R分别为0.68和0.67;P均<0.0001)。GLS的截断值为-21%时,检测心肌梗死后患者的敏感性为92%,特异性为89%;GLSR的截断值为-0.9/s时,检测心肌梗死后患者的敏感性为92%,特异性为96%。

结论

GLS和GLSR是从二维超声心动图图像评估左心室整体功能的新指标。该方法的早期验证研究表明,其在检测心肌梗死后患者左心室收缩功能障碍方面具有高敏感性和特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验