Johns Nina, Al-Salti Wasim, Cox Phillip, Kilby Mark D
Department of Fetal Medicine, Division of Reproductive and Child Health, Birmingham Women's Hospital, University of Birmingham, UK.
Prenat Diagn. 2004 May;24(5):339-46. doi: 10.1002/pd.871.
This retrospective study compares the findings of prenatal ultrasound, performed in a tertiary fetal medicine centre, with the results of post-mortem examination in pregnancies complicated by suspected fetal abnormality that results in fetal loss. The study was carried out over a year at a teaching hospital, Fetal Medicine Centre and Regional Centre for Perinatal Pathology. Results were directly compared and the level of agreement between the ultrasound and post-mortem findings described. These were classified as having complete agreement; major agreement or major disagreement. The group of cases with major agreement between findings was further divided into those with significant, or minor, additional findings at post-mortem examination. Over the 12-month period, 153 ultrasound cases were identified, of which 47 were also examined by autopsy and were thus suitable for comparison in this study (30.7%). Complete agreement between ultrasound and post-mortem findings was found in 22 cases (46.8%). In 24 cases (51.1%), major agreement between ultrasound and post-mortem findings was seen. Of these, 11 had minor additional findings at post-mortem examination and 13 were found to have significant additional findings at post-mortem (27.7%), adding to the eventual diagnosis. In 12.8% of cases, post-mortem examination provided a definitive diagnosis. Only in one case was there complete discordance in the findings of the ultrasound examination and the autopsy (2.1%). No major disagreement between ultrasound and post-mortem findings was seen in 98% of cases. This study confirms the accuracy of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis in specialist centres, whilst emphasising the continuing importance of post-mortem examination in cases of fetal malformation to refine and, in some cases, define the diagnosis.
这项回顾性研究比较了在一家三级胎儿医学中心进行的产前超声检查结果与因疑似胎儿异常导致胎儿丢失的妊娠尸检结果。该研究在一家教学医院、胎儿医学中心和围产期病理学区域中心进行了一年。直接比较了结果,并描述了超声检查和尸检结果之间的一致性水平。这些结果被分类为完全一致、主要一致或主要不一致。在检查结果主要一致的病例组中,进一步分为在尸检时有显著或轻微额外发现的病例。在这12个月期间,共识别出153例超声检查病例,其中47例也进行了尸检,因此适合本研究进行比较(30.7%)。超声检查和尸检结果完全一致的有22例(46.8%)。在24例(51.1%)中,超声检查和尸检结果主要一致。其中,11例在尸检时有轻微额外发现,13例在尸检时有显著额外发现(27.7%),这增加了最终诊断。在12.8%的病例中,尸检提供了明确诊断。只有1例超声检查结果与尸检结果完全不一致(2.1%)。98%的病例中未发现超声检查和尸检结果之间有主要不一致。本研究证实了专科中心产前超声诊断的准确性,同时强调了在胎儿畸形病例中尸检对于完善并在某些情况下明确诊断的持续重要性。