Minotti Giorgio, Menna Pierantonio, Salvatorelli Emanuela, Cairo Gaetano, Gianni Luca
G. d'Annunzio University School of Medicine, Centro Studi sull'Invecchiamento, Room 412, Via dei Vestini, 66013 Chieti, Italy.
Pharmacol Rev. 2004 Jun;56(2):185-229. doi: 10.1124/pr.56.2.6.
The clinical use of anthracyclines like doxorubicin and daunorubicin can be viewed as a sort of double-edged sword. On the one hand, anthracyclines play an undisputed key role in the treatment of many neoplastic diseases; on the other hand, chronic administration of anthracyclines induces cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure usually refractory to common medications. Second-generation analogs like epirubicin or idarubicin exhibit improvements in their therapeutic index, but the risk of inducing cardiomyopathy is not abated. It is because of their janus behavior (activity in tumors vis-à-vis toxicity in cardiomyocytes) that anthracyclines continue to attract the interest of preclinical and clinical investigations despite their longer-than-40-year record of longevity. Here we review recent progresses that may serve as a framework for reappraising the activity and toxicity of anthracyclines on basic and clinical pharmacology grounds. We review 1) new aspects of anthracycline-induced DNA damage in cancer cells; 2) the role of iron and free radicals as causative factors of apoptosis or other forms of cardiac damage; 3) molecular mechanisms of cardiotoxic synergism between anthracyclines and other anticancer agents; 4) the pharmacologic rationale and clinical recommendations for using cardioprotectants while not interfering with tumor response; 5) the development of tumor-targeted anthracycline formulations; and 6) the designing of third-generation analogs and their assessment in preclinical or clinical settings. An overview of these issues confirms that anthracyclines remain "evergreen" drugs with broad clinical indications but have still an improvable therapeutic index.
阿霉素和柔红霉素等蒽环类药物的临床应用可谓是一把双刃剑。一方面,蒽环类药物在许多肿瘤疾病的治疗中发挥着无可争议的关键作用;另一方面,长期使用蒽环类药物会诱发心肌病和充血性心力衰竭,而这些疾病通常对常用药物具有耐药性。表柔比星或伊达比星等第二代类似物在治疗指数方面有所改善,但诱发心肌病的风险并未降低。正是由于它们的双面性(对肿瘤细胞具有活性,而对心肌细胞具有毒性),尽管蒽环类药物已有40多年的使用历史,但它们仍继续吸引着临床前和临床研究的关注。在此,我们回顾近期的进展,这些进展可作为从基础和临床药理学角度重新评估蒽环类药物活性和毒性的框架。我们回顾了以下内容:1)蒽环类药物诱导癌细胞DNA损伤的新方面;2)铁和自由基作为细胞凋亡或其他形式心脏损伤的致病因素所起的作用;3)蒽环类药物与其他抗癌药物之间心脏毒性协同作用的分子机制;4)在不影响肿瘤反应的情况下使用心脏保护剂的药理学原理和临床建议;5)靶向肿瘤的蒽环类药物制剂的开发;6)第三代类似物的设计及其在临床前或临床环境中的评估。对这些问题的概述证实,蒽环类药物仍然是具有广泛临床适应症的“常青”药物,但治疗指数仍有待提高。