Murashita Toshifumi, Kubota Takehiro, Oba Jun-Ichi, Aoki Toshihide, Matano Jun, Yasuda Keishu
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jun;77(6):2157-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.12.019.
Excellent surgical results have been reported for repair of incomplete atrioventricular septal defect; however, left atrioventricular valve regurgitation (ltAVVR) is a major cause of late morbidity. We reviewed our entire experience with incomplete atrioventricular septal defect in order to investigate long-term results of ltAVVR after repair and determine the factors influencing the progression of ltAVVR in late follow-up.
Between 1983 and 2002, 61 patients underwent surgical repair of incomplete atrioventricular septal defect, including 7 patients with intermediate forms. The age of operation ranged from 1 month to 62 years old (median 5.3 years old). Thirteen patients were less than 2 years old, including 7 infants, while there were 15 adult patients. All patients underwent patch closure of the ostium primum defect. Before 1995, the cleft was left open in 7 patients and partial closure of the cleft was done in 41 patients, whereas complete closure of the cleft was performed in 9 patients since 1996. Preoperative and postoperative ltAVVR at hospital discharge and late follow-up were graded 0-IV by echographic evaluation.
There was 1 early death and 4 late deaths with a 91% 10-year actuarial survival rate. Preoperative ltAVVR grade was I in 25 patients, II in 31 patients, III in 4 patients, and IV in 1 patient. Postoperatively, ltAVVR deteriorated in 3 patients. Left AVVR decreased in 21 patients, whereas in 37 patients it remained the same at hospital discharge. Consequently, ltAVVR remained grade II in 18 patients, grade III in 2, and there was no patient with grade IV. During the long-term follow-up, 24 patients were noted to have increased ltAVVR, including grade III in 8 patients and grade IV in 4. Reoperations for ltAVVR were required in 5 patients (8.3% of hospital survivors); valve replacement in 3 patients and valve repair in 2. Actuarial freedom from reoperation for ltAVVR was 91% at 10 years, whereas actuarial freedom from postoperative ltAVVR grade III or more was 89% at 5 years and 78% at 10 years. Multivariate analysis indicated that postoperative ltAVVR grade II or more at hospital discharge (p = 0.0032, odds ratio = 7.41, 95%CI: 1.95-28.10) was the only independent variable related to late ltAVVR, whereas age at operation, preoperative grade of ltAVVR, and the method of cleft repair were not significant risk factors.
Left AVVR is still a significant risk in long-term follow-up. Because the postoperative grade of ltAVVR is the only independent risk factor for late ltAVVR, more efforts should be focused on left atrioventricular valve repair so as to minimize residual regurgitation, even mild regurgitation.
对于不完全性房室间隔缺损的修复,已有出色的手术结果报道;然而,左房室瓣反流(ltAVVR)是晚期发病的主要原因。我们回顾了我们在不完全性房室间隔缺损方面的全部经验,以研究修复后ltAVVR的长期结果,并确定在晚期随访中影响ltAVVR进展的因素。
1983年至2002年期间,61例患者接受了不完全性房室间隔缺损的手术修复,其中包括7例中间型患者。手术年龄从1个月至62岁(中位年龄5.3岁)。13例患者年龄小于2岁,其中包括7例婴儿,同时有15例成年患者。所有患者均接受了原发孔缺损的补片修补。1995年之前,7例患者的瓣叶裂未闭合,41例患者进行了瓣叶裂部分闭合,而自1996年以来,9例患者进行了瓣叶裂完全闭合。出院时及晚期随访时的术前和术后ltAVVR通过超声心动图评估分为0 - IV级。
有1例早期死亡和4例晚期死亡,10年精算生存率为91%。术前ltAVVR分级为I级的有25例患者,II级的有31例患者,III级的有4例患者,IV级的有1例患者。术后,3例患者的ltAVVR恶化。21例患者的左房室瓣反流减少,而37例患者在出院时保持不变。因此,ltAVVR在18例患者中仍为II级,2例为III级,没有IV级患者。在长期随访中,24例患者的ltAVVR增加,其中8例为III级,4例为IV级。5例患者(占住院幸存者的8.3%)需要因ltAVVR再次手术;3例患者进行瓣膜置换,2例进行瓣膜修复。ltAVVR再次手术的10年精算无再手术率为91%,而术后ltAVVR III级或更高分级的5年精算无发生率为89%,10年为78%。多因素分析表明,出院时术后ltAVVR II级或更高分级(p = 0.0032,比值比 = 7.41,95%CI:1.95 - 28.10)是与晚期ltAVVR相关的唯一独立变量,而手术年龄、术前ltAVVR分级和瓣叶裂修复方法不是显著的危险因素。
左房室瓣反流在长期随访中仍然是一个重大风险。由于术后ltAVVR分级是晚期ltAVVR的唯一独立危险因素,应更加注重左房室瓣修复,以尽量减少残余反流,即使是轻度反流。