Suppr超能文献

环氧化酶-2抑制剂与非选择性非甾体抗炎药及老年患者充血性心力衰竭结局:一项基于人群的队列研究

Cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors versus non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and congestive heart failure outcomes in elderly patients: a population-based cohort study.

作者信息

Mamdani Muhammad, Juurlink David N, Lee Douglas S, Rochon Paula A, Kopp Alex, Naglie Gary, Austin Peter C, Laupacis Andreas, Stukel Therese A

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.

出版信息

Lancet. 2004 May 29;363(9423):1751-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16299-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-selective, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with an increased risk of congestive heart failure, but little is known about the cardiovascular effects of a newer group of NSAIDS called selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors. We aimed to compare rates of admission for congestive heart failure in elderly patients who were newly dispensed COX-2 inhibitors or non-selective NSAIDs.

METHODS

In this population-based retrospective cohort study we identified NSAID-naive individuals aged 66 years or older, who were started on rofecoxib (n=14,583), celecoxib (n=18,908), and non-selective NSAIDs (n=5,391), and randomly selected non-NSAID users as controls (n=100,000).

FINDINGS

Relative to non-NSAID users, patients on rofecoxib and non-selective NSAIDS had an increased risk of admission for congestive heart failure (adjusted rate ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.5-2.2, and 1.4, 1.0-1.9, respectively), but not celecoxib (1.0, 0.8-1.3). Compared with celecoxib users, admission was significantly more likely in users of non-selective NSAIDs (1.4, 1.0-1.9) and rofecoxib (1.8, 1.4-2.4). Risk of admission for rofecoxib users was higher than that for non-selective NSAID users (1.5, 1.1-2.1). Of patients with no admission in the past 3 years, only rofecoxib users were at increased risk of subsequent admission relative to controls (1.8, 1.4-2.3).

INTERPRETATION

These findings suggest a higher risk of admission for congestive heart failure in users of rofecoxib and non-selective NSAIDs, but not celecoxib, relative to non-NSAID controls.

摘要

背景

非选择性非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)与充血性心力衰竭风险增加相关,但对于一类名为选择性环氧化酶(COX)-2抑制剂的新型NSAIDs的心血管效应知之甚少。我们旨在比较新使用COX-2抑制剂或非选择性NSAIDs的老年患者充血性心力衰竭的住院率。

方法

在这项基于人群的回顾性队列研究中,我们确定了66岁及以上未使用过NSAIDs的个体,他们开始使用罗非昔布(n = 14,583)、塞来昔布(n = 18,908)和非选择性NSAIDs(n = 5,391),并随机选择未使用NSAIDs的个体作为对照(n = 100,000)。

结果

相对于未使用NSAIDs的个体,使用罗非昔布和非选择性NSAIDs的患者充血性心力衰竭住院风险增加(调整后的率比分别为1.8,95%可信区间1.5 - 2.2和1.4,1.0 - 1.9),但塞来昔布使用者未增加(1.0,0.8 - 1.3)。与塞来昔布使用者相比,非选择性NSAIDs使用者(1.4,1.0 - 1.9)和罗非昔布使用者(1.8,1.4 - 2.4)住院的可能性显著更高。罗非昔布使用者的住院风险高于非选择性NSAIDs使用者(1.5,1.1 - 2.1)。在过去3年未住院的患者中,只有罗非昔布使用者相对于对照组后续住院风险增加(1.8,1.4 - 2.3)。

解读

这些发现表明,相对于未使用NSAIDs的对照组,罗非昔布和非选择性NSAIDs使用者充血性心力衰竭住院风险更高,而塞来昔布使用者未增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验